EXPLORING SCAFFOLDING APPROACH TO TEACH ENGLISH IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Sutrisno Sadji Evenddy, Nurhaeda Gailea, Syafrizal Syafrizal

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of scaffolding strategies in facilitating English language learning and proficiency among students in higher education settings. This study employs a comprehensive literature review method to systematically examine and synthesize existing scholarly works related to the application of scaffolds in teaching English. The literature review also scrutinizes challenges and considerations in implementing scaffolding, providing a foundation for the identification of gaps in current research and areas that require further exploration. The study  explores pedagogical strategies, assess the integration of technology, delve into collaborative learning environments, and investigate real-world applications of the scaffolding in language education.


Keywords


English Teaching, Higher Education, Scaffolding Approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhikari, Y. N. (2021). Integrating Technology into English Language Teaching in Nepal: Student and Teacher Perspectives. Prithvi Academic Journal, 4, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.3126/paj.v4i0.37052

Alwahibee, K. M. (2019). The Impact of Scaffolding Techniques on Saudi English-Language Learners’ Speaking Abilities. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 37. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p37

Amare, M. Y., & Simonova, S. (2021). Learning analytics for higher education: proposal of big data ingestion architecture. SHS Web of Conferences, 92, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219202002

Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999

Chen, C. (2021). Using Scaffolding Materials to Facilitate Autonomous Online Chinese as a Foreign Language Learning: A Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040131

Chen, C. H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010

Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544

Dewi, L. R., & Kartowagiran, B. (2018). An evaluation of internship program by using Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Research and Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i2.22495

Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638

Doria, N. G., & Simão, L. M. (2018). Differing times and differing measures: Dimensions of historical time in Vygotsky’s work. Theory and Psychology, 28(6), 757–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318787345

Esteban-Guitart, M. (2018). The biosocial foundation of the Early Vygotsky: Educational psychology before the zone of proximal development. History of Psychology, 21(4), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000092

Fischer, F., Bauer, E., Seidel, T., Schmidmaier, R., Radkowitsch, A., Neuhaus, B. J., Hofer, S. I., Sommerhoff, D., Ufer, S., Kuhn, J., Küchemann, S., Sailer, M., Koenen, J., Gartmeier, M., Berberat, P., Frenzel, A., Heitzmann, N., Holzberger, D., Pfeffer, J., … Fischer, M. R. (2022). Representational scaffolding in digital simulations – learning professional practices in higher education. Information and Learning Science, 123(11–12), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2022-0076

Hong, Y., Chen, L. G., Huang, J. H., Tsai, Y. Y., & Chang, T. Y. (2022). The Impact of Cooperative Learning Method on the Oral Proficiency of Learners of the Training Program for English Tourist Guides. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866863

Iberahim, A., Md Yunus, M., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2023). A Review on Technology Enhanced Language Learning (TELL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i2/16496

Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1

Kurian, B. (2022). The Study of Activity Based Learning (ABL) and their Challenges in Implementation for Higher Education Institutions. Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology, 11(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajsat-2022.11.2.3216

Lingaiah, J., & Dhanapal, S. (2020). Effect of Graphic Organizer and Instructional Scaffolding on Argumentative Essay Writing Performance: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.10.2020.p10602

Liu, L. (2018). Teaching EFL Reading Skills with Instructional Scaffolding Microlectures: Chinese Non-English Major Undergraduates’ Performances and Perceptions. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.52.4132

Liu, Z., Hua, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Scaffolding Instruction in Virtual Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.20

López, P., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Fidalgo, R. (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-primary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054

Manasikana, I., & Hartono, H. (2021). Teaching Internship Program for the Development of Student Teachers� Pedagogical Competence: Students� Voices. Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.30659/jamr.2.2.53-61

Nagro, S. A., deBettencourt, L. U., Rosenberg, M. S., Carran, D. T., & Weiss, M. P. (2017). The effects of guided video analysis on teacher candidates’ reflective ability and instructional skills. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416680469

Nourazar, S., Kakvand, R., & Aliasin, S. H. (2022). The Impact of Scaffolded Metacognitive Writing Strategy Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6297895

Ouyang, F., Dai, X., & Chen, S. (2022). Applying multimodal learning analytics to examine the immediate and delayed effects of instructor scaffoldings on small groups’ collaborative programming. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00361-z

P, S., & Karthikeyan, M. R. (2021). Industry 4.0 Challenges and Implementation in Education Sector in India. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(5), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i5.2021.3911

Pazilah, F. N. P., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Using Technology in ESL Classroom: Highlights and Challenges. Creative Education, 10(12), 3205–3212. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012244

Pentimonti, J. M., Justice, L. M., Yeomans-Maldonado, G., McGinty, A. S., Slocum, L., & O’Connell, A. (2017). Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117700865

Puluhulawa, R., Hafifah, G. N., & Mayasari, L. (2022). Students’ Learning Strategies in Public Speaking Class at Higher Education Level. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v9i2.82

Richardson, J. C., Caskurlu, S., Castellanos-Reyes, D., Duan, S., Duha, M. S. U., Fiock, H., & Long, Y. (2022). Instructors’ conceptualization and implementation of scaffolding in online higher education courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 242–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09300-3

Sarmiento-Campos, N. V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E. N., Cuellar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y. L., Apaza, O. A., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). A Look at Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT): The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Method on EFL Learners’ Speaking Achievement. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514892

Selelo, M. E., & Manamela, M. G. (2022). Coining Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Reference to COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v9i2p53

Sholeh, A., Setyosari, P., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sulthoni. (2019). Effects of scaffolded voluntary reading on efl students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12419a

Tolentino, J. A. M., & Santos, E. W. (2020). Proficiency and Confidence Levels of English Language Students in Relation to ASEAN Integration’s Regional Lingua Franca. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7494–7499. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082533

Vassilieva, J., & Zavershneva, E. (2020). Vygotsky’s “Height Psychology”: Reenvisioning General Psychology in Dialogue With the Humanities and the Arts. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020902723

Vellanki, S. S., Mond, S., Khan, Z. K., & Nair, L. G. (2022). Teachers’ Viewpoint of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in Listening during Remote Teaching in Oman: Challenges and Strategies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.5

Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2022). Problem solving in chemistry supported by metacognitive scaffolding: teaching associates’ perspectives and practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00242b

Wu, S. Y. (2020). Incorporation of Collaborative Problem Solving and Cognitive Tools to Improve Higher Cognitive Processing in Online Discussion Environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119828044

Yu, B., Bodycott, P., & Mak, A. S. (2019). Language and Interpersonal Resource Predictors of Psychological and Sociocultural Adaptation: International Students in Hong Kong. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(5), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318825336

Zhong, L. (2022). Creative thinking in the teaching of Chinese language and literature in colleges from the perspective of educational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1018289

Zulfikar, T., Nidawati, Khasinah, S., & Mayangsari, I. (2020). Indonesian students’ perceived benefits of the micro-teaching course to their teaching internship. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.17509/IJAL.V10I1.25063




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v16i1.73541

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by Universitas Tanjungpura
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124
Telp: (0561) 740144 Kotak Post 1049

website: http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jvip

email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats