PENELURUSAN RUANG KORIDOR KOTA DALAM PRODUKSI RUANG SOSIAL TEMPORAL

Rully Damayanti, Bramasta Putra Redyantanu

Abstract


Dinamika suatu kawasan kota dapat memberikan dampak pada pola pemanfaatan lahan, termasuk guna ruang sebuah jalan dari ruang pergerakan menjadi ruang sosial. Perubahan pola ini menunjukkan adanya isu temporalitas pada fenomena pemanfaatan ruang publik yang tidak terpikirkan sebelumnya. Artikel ini melakukan studi tentang produksi ruang sosial pada ruang koridor kota di Tunjungan, Surabaya. Kerangka teoritis yang dipakai pada penelitian ini adalah pemahaman ruang yang terbentuk karena faktor sosial, tidak hanya fisik. Melalui metode observasi lapangan yang mendalam, diilustrasikan bagaimana sebuah ruang jalan dapat menjadi cerminan dan praktek produksi ruang sosial terkait isu temporalitas. Melalui studi ini juga diusulkan pengembangan desain sebagai tanggapan arsitektural yang dapat mewadahi kedinamisan ruang kota. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya potensi yang besar terhadap ruang ruang non aktivitas, seperti koridor jalan, sebagai ruang terjadinya interaksi sosial dalam kehidupan kota melalui elemen-elemen kota yang temporer. Masyarakat tidak hanya menghasilkan hubungan sosial dan nilai guna, tetapi dengan berbuat demikian juga menghasilkan sebuah ruang sosial.


TRACING THE CITY CORRIDOR SPACE IN THE PRODUCTION OF TEMPORAL SOCIAL SPACE


The dynamics of a city area can impact land-use patterns, including the spatial use of an urban corridor, which transforms from a movement area to a social space. That pattern transformation shows a temporality issue in public space, which was not thought of before. This article conducts a study on the production of social space in urban corridor spaces in Tunjungan, Surabaya. The theoretical framework used in this research is an understanding of space formed due to social factors, not just physical. An in-depth field observation method illustrates how a street space can be a reflection and practice of producing social space related to the issue of temporality. Through this city study, it is also proposed to develop an architectural design that can accommodate space dynamics. The findings of this study indicate that there is excellent potential for non-activity spaces, such as road corridors, as spaces for social interaction to occur in city life through temporary city elements. Society not only produces social relations and use-values but, by doing so, also produces a social space.


Keywords


Ruang Kota, Temporalitas, Koridor Kota

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, J. (1999). Worlds within cities. City Worlds, 53–98.

Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: reimagining the urban. Polity Press.

Benny Poerbantanoe. (1999). THE LOST-CITY DAN LOST-SPACE KARENA PERKEMBANGAN PENGEMBANGAN TATA-RUANG KOTA Kasus Koridor Komersial Jalan Tunjungan Kotamadya Surabaya. DIMENSI (Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur), 27(2), 31–39.

http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ars/article/view/15715

Bromley, R. (1979). Organization, regulation and exploitation in the so-called ‘urban informal sector’: The street traders of Cali, Colombia. In The Urban Informal Sector (pp. 1161–1171). Elsevier.

Burgess, E. W. (2008). The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. In Urban ecology (pp. 71–78). Springer.

Butt, A. (2021). As plain as spilt salt: the city as social structure in The Dispossessed. Textual Practice, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1974536

Colby, C. C. (1933). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in urban geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 23(1), 1–20.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Damayanti, R., & Kossak, F. (2016). Extending Kevin Lynch’s concept of imageability in third space reading; case study of Kampungs, Surabaya–Indonesia. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2016.36349

Degen, M. (2017). Urban regeneration and “resistance of place”: foregrounding time and experience. Space and Culture, 20(2), 141–155.

Ferreri, M. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera, 15(1), 181.

Fyfe, N. (2006). Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=JbNnCjS425AC

Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=X707aiCq6T8C

Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0jADDQAAQBAJ

Handinoto. (1996). Perkembangan kota dan arsitektur kolonial Belanda di Surabaya, 1870-1940. Diterbitkan atas kerjasama Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada~….

Hantono, D. (2017). Pengaruh Ruang Publik Terhadap Kualitas Visual Jalan Kali Besar Jakarta. Arsitektura, 15(2), 532. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v15i2.15114

Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: a framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1–3), 101–131.

Kamalipour, H. (2016). Urban Morphologies in Informal Settlements. Contour, 3: Agency/Agents of Urbanity, 1–10.

Koster, M. (2020). An Ethnographic Perspective on Urban Planning in Brazil: Temporality, Diversity and Critical Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12765

Krier, R. (1998). Urban Space. Academy Editions. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Wh1dxwEACAAJ

Krisetya, A. T., & Navastara, A. M. (2019). Identifikasi Karakteristik Fisik Koridor Jalan Tunjungan sebagai Ruang Publik. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v7i2.32695

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. The Production of Space. https://doi.org/10.2307/490789

Maciusik, B., Lenda, M., & Skórka, P. (2010). Corridors, local food resources, and climatic conditions affect the utilization of the urban environment by the Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus in winter. Ecological Research, 25(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0649-7

May, J., & Thrift, N. (2003). Timespace: geographies of temporality (Vol. 13). Routledge.

Morrissey, M., & Gaffikin, F. (2006). Planning for peace in contested space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 873–893.

Murphy, K. D., & O’Driscoll, S. (2021). Introduction: Public Space/Contested Space. In Public Space/Contested Space (pp. 1–15). Routledge.

Nemeškal, J., Ouředníček, M., & Pospíšilová, L. (2020). Temporality of urban space: daily rhythms of a typical week day in the Prague metropolitan area. Journal of Maps, 16(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1709577

Patriajaya, A. C., & Kusliansjah, Y. K. (2019). Hilangnya karakter pedestrian shopping street Jalan Tunjungan akibat transformasi Surabaya sebagai Kota Metropolitan. Hartshorn 1992, 73–84.

Peralta, G., Fenoglio, M. S., & Salvo, A. (2011). Physical barriers and corridors in urban habitats affect colonisation and parasitism rates of a specialist leaf miner. Ecological Entomology, 36(6), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01316.x

Redyantanu, B. P. (2017). KETERPADUAN BLOK TUNJUNGAN DALAM KONTEKS PERENCANAAN KOTA YANG IDEAL. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2017.015.02.2

Redyantanu, B. P., & Damayanti, R. (2017). TEMPORALITY IN A DISCUSSION OF SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.44.2.163-170

Setyowati, M. D., Arsitektur, P. S., Sains, F., & Yogyakarta, U. T. (2011). Pemanfaatan Pedestrian Ways di Koridor Komersial di Koridor Jalan Pemuda Kota Magelang. 15(1), 13–22.

Silas, J., Siahaan, H., Purnomo, T., & Yayasan Keluarga Bhakti (Surabaya, I. (1996). Kampung Surabaya menuju metropolitan. Yayasan Keluarga Bhakti dan Surabaya Post. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jW9PAAAAMAAJ

Simonsen, K. (2017). Spatiality, Temporality and the Construction of the City. In Space Odysseys (pp. 43–61). Routledge.

Soja, E. W. (1998). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other Real-and-Imagined Places. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689806400112

Stevens, Q. (2018). Temporary uses of urban spaces: How are they understood as ‘creative’? International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1673

Sunaryo, R. G., Soewarno, N., Ikaputra, & Setiawan, B. (2010). Posisi Ruang Publik dalam Transformasi Konsepsi Urbanitas Kota Indonesia. Serap, 1–8. http://repository.petra.ac.id/id/eprint/15517

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UcdJxonfeGMC

Xue, D., & Huang, G. (2008). Regulation beyond formal regulation: Spatial gathering and surviving situation of the informal sectors in urban village case study in Xiadu Village of Guangzhou City. Geographical Research, 6, 18.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v9i1.47672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 View My Stats

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office/Publisher Address:
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak, 78124, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia.
E-mail address: langkaubetang@untan.ac.id