KOMPARASI PENCAHAYAAN BOOTH DENGAN METODE PERHITUNGAN MANUAL DAN SIMULASI RELUX DESKTOP 2020.2.3.0

Tri Susetyo Andadari, LMF Purwanto, Prasasto Satwiko, Ridwan Sanjaya

Abstract


Sistem perhitungan pencahayaan penting untuk mengetahui jumlah dan tipe armatur, tingkat efektifitas kuat penerangan pada bidang kerja, serta untuk mengetahui besarnya pemakaian energi listrik pada suatu ruangan. Sistem perhitungan pencahayaan bisa dilakukan secara manual atau dengan simulasi menggunakan software pencahayaan. Kedua metode tersebut, menjadi alternatif pilihan bagi arsitek dalam mendapatkan formula pencahayaan buatan untuk desainnya. Namun permasalahannya adalah bagaimanakah perbandingan ketepatan kedua metode tersebut? Bagaimanakah hasil kedua metode tersebut terhadap standar yang berlaku? Dan bagaimanakah kualitas hasil perhitungan kedua metode tersebut? Untuk itulah, penelitian ini berusaha membandingkan metode perhitungan pencahayaan secara manual dan secara simulasi agar hasilnya bisa digunakan sebagai acuan arsitek dalam menentukan sistem perhitungan pencahayaan yang tepat pada desainnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental, dengan metode komparatif dan menggunakan booth sebagai media uji. Software simulasi yang dipilih adalah Relux Desktop versi 2020.2.3.0, dengan pertimbangan sudah lama release, mudah pengoperasionalannya dan banyak digunakan oleh praktisi.  Hasil akhir menunjukkan bahwa luaran perhitungan sistem pencahayaan secara simulasi (1) lebih akurat dengan deviasi maximal 4%, (2) rerata besar kuat penerangan pada bidang kerja dan pemakaian energi listrik lebih rendah terhadap standar yang berlaku dan (3) kualitas luaran lebih lengkap berupa kalkulasi, gambar perspektif sebaran cahaya dan gambar kontur sebaran pencahayaan sesuai titik lampu.

 

BOOTH LIGHTING COMPARISON WITH MANUAL AND RELUX DESKTOP 2020.2.3.0 SIMULATION CALCULATION METHODS

 

The lighting calculation system is essential to determine the number and type of armature, light strength effectiveness, and electrical energy consumption. The lighting calculation system can be done manually or with simulation software. Both methods are alternative architects to obtain artificial lighting formulas. The problem is how to compare the accuracy of the two methods? How do the results of the two methods against the prevailing standards? And how is the quality of the results of the two methods? This study seeks to compare manual and simulation lighting calculation methods so that the results can be used as a reference for architects in determining the appropriate lighting calculation system. This research is an experimental study, with a comparative method and using a booth as a medium. The simulation software uses Relux Desktop version 2020.2.3.0, because it has been released for a long time, is easy to operate, and is widely used by architects. The final results show that the simulation output of the lighting system is (1) more accurate with a maximum deviation of 4%, (2) the average light strength in the work area, and the use of electrical energy is lower than the prevailing standards and (3) the quality of the output is more complete in the form of calculations, perspective drawing of light distribution and contour drawing of lighting distribution according to the position of the light points.


Keywords


Perhitungan Pencahayaan, Simulasi Pencahayaan, Relux Desktop

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, Z., & Citraningrum, A. (2018). Evaluasi Tata Cahaya Pada Ruang Koleksi Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia di Jakarta. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Brawijaya, 6(4).

Ariani Mandala , Amirani Ritva S, R. G. (2016). Perhitungan Manual , Simulasi Maket , Dan Simulasi Digital.

Bossel, H. (2007). Systems and Models. Complexity, Dynamics, Evolution, Sustainability.

Bouroussis, C. A., Nikolaou, D. T., & Topalis, F. V. (2019). Test report on the validation of Relux Desktop 2019 against CIE 171:2006. Lighting Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens, May. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14488.24320

Choudhury, A. K. R. (2014). 1 - Characteristics of light sources. In A. K. R. Choudhury (Ed.), Principles of Colour and Appearance Measurement (pp. 1–52). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099242.1

Davoodi, A. (2016). Lighting Simulation for a more value-driven building design process. 56. https://sci-hub.do/https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:967485

Dehoff, P. (2012). Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency is not a Contradiction. Light and Engineering, 20, 34–39.

Dehoff, P. (2014). Measures for a better quality in lighting a journey through recent activities in applications and standards. Light and Engineering, 22, 68–74.

Duff, J. (2015). On a New Method for Interior Lighting Design. Technological University Dublin. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7RS33

Fesanghary, M., Asadi, S., & Geem, Z. W. (2012). Design of low-emission and energy-efficient residential buildings using a multi-objective optimization algorithm. Building and Environment, 49, 245–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.030

Habel, J., & Žák, P. (2011). Energy performance of lighting systems. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 87(4), 20–24.

Hamdy, M., Hasan, A., & Sirén, K. (2011). Applying a multi-objective optimization approach for Design of low-emission cost-effective dwellings. Building and Environment, 46, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.006

Hirning, M. (2014). The Application of Luminance Mapping to Discomfort Glare : A Modified Glare Index for Green Buildings (p. 148).

Kralikova, R., Andrejiova, M., & Wessely, E. (2015). Energy saving techniques and strategies for illumination in industry. Procedia Engineering, 100(January), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.357

Ningsar, & Sangkertadi, P. (2013). Perhitungan dan Rancangan Penerangan Buatan pada Ruang Dubbing Suatu Studio Produksi Film (Calculation and Design of Artificial Lighting System of a Dubbing Room). Jurnal Arsitektur DASENG, 2(1), 67–73.

Pegler, M. M. (2012). Visual Merchandising and Display. Fairchild Books.

Philips. (2013). Lighting Catalog Lamp Specification Guide 2013. 163. http://www.usa.lighting.philips.com/pwc_li/us_en/connect/tools_literature/downloads/sg100-2013.pdf

Poling, R. M. (2018). A New Method for Calculating Luminous Flux Using High Dynamic Range Imaging and Its Applications. Faculty of the University of Kansas.

Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2001). Tata cara perancangan sistem pencahayaan buatan pada bangunan gedung . Standar Nasional Indonesia.

Widodo, S., Ardana, I. G. N., Yong, S. De, Studi, P., Interior, D., Petra, U.

K., Siwalankerto, J., Knockdown, K. K., & Lipat, K. (2016). Perancangan Modular Booth Untuk Produk Makanan dan Minuman. Jurnal Intra, 4(2), 515–523. file:///D:/interior/Pra TA/Pra TA/Jurnal buat Pra TA/4662-8871-1-SM.pdf

Yu, X., Su, Y., & Chen, X. (2014). Application of RELUX simulation to investigate energy saving potential from daylighting in a new educational building in UK. Energy and Buildings, 74, 191–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.01.024




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v8i1.43746

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 View My Stats

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office/Publisher Address:
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak, 78124, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia.
E-mail address: l[email protected]