EVALUASI PROGRAM ORGANISASI PENGGERAK DI SMP NEGERI 1 SUNGAI KAKAP KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA
Abstract
This research aims to describe the components of Needs Assessment, Program Planning, Formative Evaluation, and Summative Evaluation in the Organizational Activator Program (POP) at State Junior High School 1 Sungai Kakap, Kubu Raya Regency.The research is conducted using a qualitative descriptive approach. The data collection method uses observation techniques, interviews, and documents. The data analysis consists of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and verification/drawing conclusions. Test the validity of the data using triangulation and member checking. The main findings of this research are (1) Needs Assessment. Before participating in the Organizer Program (POP), schools faced several challenges in supporting/implementing literacy programs. (2) Program Planning. Program planning is carried out by considering the needs for facilities and infrastructure, resources, and training that have been identified in the needs assessment stage. (3) Formative Evaluation. The school encourages active participation from all stakeholders in the POP program, promoting the importance of involvement in planning and implementation. (4) Summative Evaluation. The Organizer Movement Program at SMP Negeri 1 Sungai Kakap has a significant positive impact on students' learning outcomes, reading interest, writing skills, and critical thinking abilities, as well as enhancing teachers' professionalism in teaching and writing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Alkin, Marvin C. 2004. Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorits View and Inflences. Sage Publications.
Ananda, R & Rafida,T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publising.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.)Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Transaction Publishers.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2010). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson Education.
Jurnal
Blegur, I. K. S. (2022). Pelatihan Persiapan Pembelajaran Geometri Bagi Guru Kelas Rendah Pada Program Organisasi Penggerak Provinsi NTT. Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 18–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/rengganis.v2i1.163
Gaspersz, M., Aw, S., & Gaspersz, N. (2023). Model Evaluasi Formatif-Sumatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika.(JUMADIKA). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol5iss1year2023page1-7
Scriven, M. (1959). Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory: Satisfactory explanation of the past is possible even when prediction of the future is impossible. Science, 130(3374), 477–482. https://doi:10.1126/science.130.3374.477
Scriven, M. (1986). New Frontiers of Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 7(1), 7-44, ISSN 1098-2140, https://doi.org/10.1177/109821408600700102
Scriven, M. (1991). Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 55-63, ISSN 0886-1633, https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(91)90024-R
Scriven, M. (1993). Foreword. , 16(3), 209–211, https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/0149-7189(93)90006-t
Scriven, M. (1994). The fine line between evaluation and explanation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 75-77, ISSN 0886-1633, https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90062-0
Scriven, M. (1995). The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 1995(68), 49-70, ISSN 1097-6736, https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1019
Wicaksosno L dan Dekabesi E. 2022. Kepemimpinan Kolaborasi Kepala Sekolah Dalam Membangun Tim Kinerja Guru Di Era Society 5.0
DOI: 10.36312/jisip.v6i4.3899/http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/index
Wirawan. (2020). Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Metodologi, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Yani T, Ahmad. 2011. Penanaman Nilai Kejujuran dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Komunikasi Sosial Siswa di Sekolah. [Disertasi].
Zakso, A., & Agung, I. (2021). Impact of Student Learning at Home Prevent Pandemic Covid-19 in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10, 228-228.
https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0053
Internet
Asriyani, A, (2019). Pedoman Penelitian Karya Ilmiah. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Untan.
https://www.scribd.com/document/592174989/TPKI-2019-revisi
Brown, T., Rongerude, J., Leonard, B., & Merrick, L. C. (2021). Best practices for online team‐based learning: Strengthening teams through formative peer evaluation. New Directions for Teaching&Learning,2021(165),53–64. https://e- resources.perpusnas.go.id:2229/10.1002/tl.20436
Budiarto, W. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pelaksanaan Sekolah Sehat Berkarakter di SMP Negeri 1 Pontianak. Artikel Penelitian https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Budiarto%2C+W.+%282021%29.+Evaluasi+Program+Pelaksanaan+Sekolah+Sehat+Berkarakter+di+SMP+Negeri+1+Pontianak.+Artikel+Penelitian&btnG=
Chenhong, Z., Mingli, G., Wenyu., S, & Chong Li. (2022). Formative Evaluation of College Students’ Online English Learning Based on Learning Behavior Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(10), 240–255.
https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2229/10.3991/ijet.v17i10.31543
http://kbbi.web.id/evaluasi diakses tanggal 16 November 2023
Peraturan Sekretaris Jenderal Nomor 4 tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Program Organisasi Penggerak untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/dokumen/salinan/salinan_PERSESJEN_NO_4_TAHUN_2024_AKUN_AKSES.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v17i1.85379
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
website: http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jvip
Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.