PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PICTURE AND PICTURE PROGRAM MIND ON YOUR OWN BUSINESS, METODE CERAMAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR AKUNTANSI

Korosando Fransiskus, Manggu Ngguna Raji, Elvira Fransiska

Abstract


ABSTRACTThis study aims to describe the application of the image model and MYOB accounting program and the lecture method, the differences in the learning outcomes of students in class XI SMK Yos Sudarso Ende. This experimental research uses the method of observation and tests. Explained with the next quantitative approach. Improved learning outcomes were tested with N-Gain and analyzed by t-test.Initial test results; the average value of the experimental group was 8.50, the control group was 8.67. The standard deviation of the experimental group (S1) was 2.505, the control group was 1.670. Post-test results; the average value of the experimental group was 19.42, the control group was 14.92. The Standard deviation (S2) of the experimental group was 2,938, the control group was 3,343. The N-Gain group of the experimental group had 58.33% "moderate" classification, 41.7% "high" classification. The control group N-Gain had 33.33% "low" classification, 58.33% "moderate" classification, and 8.33% high classification. The t-test shows t count t table or 3.503> 1.717 so that H0 is rejected. In conclusion, there are differences in learning outcomes between the experimental group and the control group. 

Keywords


MYOB Accounting; Lecture Method; Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Achmadi. (2009). Pemanfaatan Program MYOB Dalam Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Cakrawala Kependidikan (JCK), 57-68.

Adaminata, M. A., & Marsih, I. N. (2011, September 23). Analisis Kesalahan Konsep Siswa SMA pada Pokok Bahasan Kesetimbangan Kimia. Retrieved Januari 27, 2013, from google.com: http://portal.fi.itb.ac.id/cps/

Ajaja, P. O., & Urhievwejire, O. E. (2012). Effects Of 5E Learning Cycle On Students' Achievement In Biology And Chemistry. Journal of Educational Sciences, Vol 7, No 3., 1-13.

Amaliyanti. (2013, Maret 6). Pemahaman Siswa Dalam Proses Belajar. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from Cirukem Media Informasi: http://cirukem.org/pendidikan-cirukem/penelitian/

Anderson, L. W., & David R, K. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assesing a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objective. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Anonim. (2003). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Anonim. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Pontianak: BNSP.

Anonim. (2006). Silabus Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Depdiknas Dirjen Dikdasmen Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.

Anonim. (2008). Penetapan Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal. Jakarta: Depdiknas Dirjen Dikdasmen Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.

Anonim. (2010). Model Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Makasar: Pendidikan dan Latihan Profesi Guru (PLPG) Penyelenggara Sertifikasi Guru Rayon 24 Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Anonim. (2010). Project EASE (Effective Alternative Secondary Education) Chemisty Module 5 Colloid. Pasig City : DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue.

Archambault, J. (2008). The Effect of Developing Kinematics Concepts Graphically Prior to Introducing Algebraic Problem Solving Techniques. Action Research Required for the Master of Natural Science Degree with Concentration in Physics. Tucson: Arizona State University.

Arends, R. L. (2008). Learning To Teach Edisi Ketujuh. Yokyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Astuti, E. (2019). Pelatihan MYOB accounting Version 19 Pada Himpunan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntnasi Universitas PGRI Madiun. Sarwahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 16 No. 1 Tahun 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/sarwahita.161.02 P-ISSN: 0216-7484 E-ISSN: 2597-8926 , 10-16.

Atkins, P., & Paula, J. d. (2006). Physical Chemistry Eighth Edition. New York: OXFORD University Press.

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology. New York: Halt, Renehart and Winston.

Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enggagement, Exploration, Explanation, Extension, and Evaluation (5E) Learning Cycle and Conceptual Change Text as Learning Tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 34, No. 3, 199-203.

Budprom, W., Suksringam, P., & Singsriwo, A. (2010). Effects of Learning Environmental Education Using the 5E-Learning Cycle with Multiple Intelligences and Teacher's Handbook Approaches on Learning Achievement, Basic Science Process Skill and Critical Thinking of Grade Students. Pakistan Journal of Sosial Science , 200-204.

Byber, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Pamela Van Scotter, J. C., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. Colorado Springs: BSCS.

Chambers, J. H. (1992). Empiricist research on teaching: A philosophical and practical critique . Boston: Kluwer.

Cooperstein, S. E., & Kocevar Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond Active Learning: a Constructivist Approach to Learning. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 141-148.

Dahar, R. W. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Depdiknas. (2003). Kurikulum 2004 Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMA dan MA. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The Systematic Design of Introduction 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Duran, E., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A Learning Cycle for All Student. Ohio: Sci Links.

Ebbing, D. D., & Gammon, S. D. (2009). General Chemistry Ninth Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Erica, D. (2018). Analisa Rasio Laporan Keuangan Untuk Menilai Kinerja Perusahaan PT Kino Indonesia Tbk. Ecodemica, 2(1), Retrieved from https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ecodemica/article/view/2911, 117–124.

Fajaroh, F., & Dasna, I. W. (2004). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belaajr dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Zat Aditif dalam Bahan Makanan pada Siswa Kelas II SMU Negeri 1 Tumpang-Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 112-122.

Fajaroh, F., & Dasna, I. W. (2007, September 20). PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN MODEL SIKLUS BELAJAR (LEARNING CYCLE). Retrieved Oktober 2013, 3, from http://lubisgrafura.wordpress.com: http://lubisgrafura.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/pembelajaran-dengan-model-siklus-belajar-learning-cycle/

Fauziah, I. (2017 ). Buku Dasar-Dasar Akuntansi. Jakarta: Ilmu.

Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: Theori, perpectives, and practice. New York: Theacher Colledge, Columbia University.

Gage, N. L. (2009). A Conception of Teaching. USA: Springer.

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Refresentation in Chemical Education. Australia: Springer.

Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Dordrech: Kluwer.

Gobert, J., & Clement, J. (1999). Effects of Student Generated Diagrams versus Student Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-53.

Gronlund, N. E. (1977). Constructing Achievement Test. Englewoods cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. . American Journal of Physics tersedia http://web.mit.edu/rsi/www/2005/misc/minipaper/papers/Hake .pdf diunduh Mei 2020, 64-74.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores . USA: Dept. of Physics, Indiana University.

Hakim, A., Liliasari, & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI . International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 544-553.

Hamzah B, U. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hanuscin, D. L., & Lee, M. H. (2008). Using the Learning Cycle as a Model for Teaching the Learning Cycle to Preserve Elemtary Teacher. Journal of Elementary Science Education, Vol. 20. No. 2, 51-66.

Harjunawati, S. (2016). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Penjualan Berbasis Waterfall Model Untuk Perusahaan Dagang. . Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komputer, 2(2), 131–138.

Haryanto. (n.d.). Teori yang Melandasi Pembelajaran Konstruktivistik. Retrieved Oktober 21, 2012, from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/131656343/TEORI%20KONSTRUKTIVISTIK.pdf: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=teori+belajar+konstruktivisme&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CFgQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fstaff.uny.ac.id%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F131656343%2FTEORI%2520KONSTRUKTIVISTIK.pdf&ei=JcKDUJXiKoL5rQfMlICgCA&usg=AFQjCNFGFpRJ-2y2dGfKbH

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelly, E. (1999). Misconception and The Certainty of Response Index. Journal of Physics Education, 30.

Hery. (2014). Akuntansin Dasar 1 dan 2. Jakarta.

Hinton, M. E., & Nakleh, M. B. (1999). Students' Mikroscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reaction. Chem. Educator, 158-167.

Hoffman, R., & Laszlo, R. (1991). Representation in chemistry. Angewandte Chemie, 1-16.

Ibrahim, M. (2005). Asesmen Berkelanjutan Konsep Dasar, Tahapan Pengembangan dan Contoh. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Ibrahim, M. (2012). Konsep, Miskonsepsi dan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Jong, O. d., & Driel, J. v. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 477-491.

Joseph Stepans, S. D. (1988). The effect of two instructional models in bringing about a conceptual change in the understanding of science concepts by prospective elementary teachers. Science Education, 185–195.

Keig, P. F., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translation of Representation of the Structure of Matter and Its Relationship to Reasoning, Gender, Spatial Reasoning, and Specific Prior Knowledge. Keig, Patricia F.; Rubba, Peter A., 883-903.

Khozanah, H., Sutama, & Fuadi, &. D. (2020). Efektifitas Pengelolaan Pembelajaran MYOB Accounting Berbasis Weblog Di SMKN 1 Sragen. Jurnal Varidika, Vo.3 No. 2 Desember Website: http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/varidika, 56-61.

Levine, I. N. (2009). Physical Chemistry 6th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Lorsbach, A. (2002). The Learning Cycle as A Tool for Planning Science Instruction. Retrieved Desember 10, 2002, from http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy.html.

Mayer, R. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction New Directions for Teaching and Learning. Learning and Instruction, 55-71.

Mayer, R. (2002). Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction New Directions for Teaching and Learning. Learning and Instruction, 55-71.

Mayer, R. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design method across different media. Learning and Instruction, 125-139.

Mudmainnah, N. F. (2009). Pengaruh Software Myob Accounting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Akuntansi Siswa Di SMA Muhammadiyah 6 Palembang. Jurnal Profit Volume 4, Nomor 1, Mei 2017, 4(1) Retrieved from http://jurnal.poltekba.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/390/238, 43–51.

Nazriati, & Fajaroh, F. (2007). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Learning Cycle dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Berbahan ajar Terpadu (Makroskopik Mikroskopik) terhadap Motivasi, Hasil Belajar dan Retensi Kimia Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan Tahun 17, Nomor 2, 90-108.

Nazriati, & Fajaroh, F. (2007). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Learning Cycle dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Berbahan Ajar Terpadu (Makroskopis Mikroskopis) Terhadap Motivasi, Hasil Belajar, dan Retensi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 90-108.

Nismalasari, Santiani, & Rohmadi, d. H. (2016). Penerpan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis. EduSains Volume 4 Nomor 2; ISSN 2338-4387 , 83.

Normah. ((2018). Retrieved from http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jtk/article/view/2442/1905). Implementasi It Pada Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Pt. Master Grafika Jakarta. Teknik Komputer, 4(1), 56–65.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (2002). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge Universitry Press.

Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and Epistemology. New York: The Viking Press.

Prabowo. (2011). Metodelogi Penelitian (Sains dan Pendidikan Sains). Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Prawiradilaga, D. S. (2009). Prinsip Disain Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana.

Pribadi, B. A. (2009). Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.

Priyati, N. (2013). Pengantar Akuntansi. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Purtina, A. ( 2019). The Implementation Of MYOB Program As A Learning Resource In Accounting Learning On The Eleventh Grade Students of SMKN 2 Palangka Raya. Pedagogik Jurnal Pendidikan, Oktober, Volume 14 Nomor 2, , 20-27.

Purwanto, M. N. (2004). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Puspasari, A., Yulianto, E., Mustomi, D., & Setiawan, &. A. (2020). Penerapan MYOB Accounting V.8 Dalam Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan PT. Sumber Megah Perkasa. Journal Speed – Sentra Penelitian Engineering dan Edukasi – Volume 12 No 3 – Juli speed.web.id, 1 - 10.

Rahmawati, M. (2015). Peran Aplikasi Komputer Berbasis Akuntansi untuk Badan Usaha dalam Perspektif Sistem Informasi. ), 172–183. Retrieved from. Perspektif, 13(2), Retrieved from http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/perspektif/article/view/921, 172–183.

Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Renner, J., Abraham, M., & Bernie, H. (1988). The Necessity of Each Phase of The Learning Cycle in Teaching High School Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol 25 (1), 39-58.

Sakti, H. G., & anwar, Z. (2020). Effektivitas Penggunaan Media MYOBPembelajaran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Akuntansi Kelas XI di SMKN 1 Sakra Kabupaten Lombok Timur Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Vol.1, No.2, pp. 1-10 e-ISSN 2721-4796 , 1-10.

Settlage, J. (2000, Juli 15). Understanding the Learning Cycle: Influence on Abilities to Embrace the Approach by Preservice Elementary School Teachers. Science Teacher Education, 43-50.

Sihaloho, M. (2008). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Pergeseran Kesetimbangan Kimia pada Tingkat Makroskopis dan Mikroskopis siswa di SMA Negeri Gorontalo. Retrieved Oktober 14, 2012, from journal.ung.ac.id/filejurnal/.../MSVol5No2_06.pdf: www.google.com

Simatupang, D. (2008). Pembelajaran Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 62-70.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview . Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2-20.

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik Edisi Kesembilan. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Stanislaus, U. (2009). Pedoman Analisi Data dengan SPSS. Yokyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Suciono, B. d. (2013). Modul Mengoperasikan Aplikasi Komputer Akuntasi. Jakarta: Erlangga https://oldsite.gunadarma.ac.id/library/articles/graduate/economy/2009/Artikel_21205188.pdf.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Media Pengajaran (Penggunaan dan Pembuatannya). Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). Sistem Akuntansi. . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Sundayana, R. (2010). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan . Garut: STKIP Garut Press.

Sunyono, I. W. (2008). Identifikasi Masalah Kesulitan dalam Pembelajaran Kimia SMA Kelas X di Propinsi Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 1-12.

Susanto, A. (2013). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. . Bandung: Lingga Jaya.

Susiwi. (2007). Siklus Belajar Suatu Model dalam Pembelajaran Kimia "Handout". Retrieved Mei 30, 2013, from http://file.upi.edu: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._KIMIA/195109191980032-SUSIWI/SUSIWI-27)._HANDOUT_SIKLUS_BELAJAR.pdf

Syukri. (1999). Kimia Dasar 2. Bandung: ITB.

Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond Constructivism: the Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science. Studies in Science Education, 125-184.

Talib, O., Matthews, R., & Secombe, M. (n.d.). Constructivist Animation: A Promosing Alternative Tool in Bridging Theory - Practice Gap in Science Education. Retrieved Juni 4, 2013, from http://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed05/AbstractsFullPapers2005/files%5Csubtheme3%5COT.pdf: http://www.google.com

Tarigan, B. (n.d.). Penggunaan Peta Konsep dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman siswa Terhadap Pengajaran Kimia Karbon . Retrieved Januari 27, 2013, from google,com: http://isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/Ed4Jul-Ags073743.pdf

Thoha, M. C. (2003). Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wadsworth. (1989). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive and Affective Development (4th ed.). New York: Logman.

Willer, D., & Willer, J. (1973). Systematic empiricism: Critique of a pseudoscience. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Wu, C., & Foos, J. (2010). Making Chemistry Fun to Learn . Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 3-7.

Wu, H.-k., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2000). Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students’ Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom. New Orleans, LA.: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, April 28-May 1, 2000.

Zaenuri, M. ( 2014). Penerapan Aplikasi Software Myob Pada Perusahaan Dagang (Toko Angkasa Komputer) . INFOKAM Nomor II / Th. IX/ September http://amikjtc.com/jurnal/index.php/jurnal/article/view/46, 27 - 36.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v13i2.45305

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by Universitas Tanjungpura
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124
Telp: (0561) 740144 Kotak Post 1049

website: http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jvip

email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats