KAJIAN SOSIOPRAGMATIK IMPERATIF DALAM DEBAT PILKADA DKI JAKARTA TAHUN 2017

Yulmi Hartinah, Nanang Heryana, Agus Syahrani

Abstract


 

Abstract

The problem in this research is the form and meaning of imperative in the second round of election debate of DKI Jakarta in 2017 and the text material substance, in order to describe the problem. The benefit of the research is to increase the insight regarding the form and meaning of imperative in the second round of election debate of DKI Jakarta in 2017.The method in this research is descriptive method with qualitative form. Technique of presenting data analysis that is informal technique.Based on the results of this research data analysis resulted in the conclusion that there are four imperative forms include; (1) the imperative form of demand, (2) the permit imperative form, (3) the imperative form of invitation, (4) the imperative form of the order. This study succeeded in collecting twelve imperative meanings, 3 meanings of imperative command, 15 imperative meanings of invitation, 28 imperative meaning of madness, 10 eating imperative appeal, 6 imperative meaning of surrender, 7 imperative meaning of demand, 5 imperative meanings permitting, 7 meaning imperative hope, 1 imperative meaning ngelulu, 1 meaning mperatif ban, 10 meaning imperative insistence, and 8 meaning imperative plea.

 

Keywords: Impratif meaning, Sociopragmatic, Debate


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



JPPK:  Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa

telah diindeks oleh:

          

              


Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa  diterbitkan oleh

[Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Tanjungpura
Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia.

CP : 081253684719

ISSN: 2715-2723 (online)



Ini adalah situs web yang menerbitkan artikel akses terbuka yang didistribusikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Berlisensi  persyaratan  Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .Lisensi Creative Commons