TINDAK TUTUR NEGOSIASI DALAM BERMAIN PERAN SISWA SMK DAN PEMANFAATANNYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA DI SEKOLAH
Abstract
Abstrak
Language is one of the means of communication, through human language can interact (communicate) share experiences, learn from each other, and enhance intellectual abilities. In communication. The form of research used by researchers is qualitative, why? Because this research deals with qualitative characteristics. So the reason researchers chose qualitative forms were as follows (1) data collected in the original or natural conditions (2) Based on observations and interviews, (3) the data obtained from this study were in the form of words, pictures, and not numbers, (4) scientific setting, avoiding realities as provisions that cannot be separated from the context, Based on the results of data analysis, the final conclusions can be drawn about the speech acts proposed by Searle with the speech acts of negotiation in the role of class X AK 1 of Immanuel II Vocational High School II are (1) representative speech acts in the role of class X AK 1 student of SMK K Immanuel II act to inform something, show, explain, state, and express opinions, (2) directive speech acts in the role of students of class X AK 1 SMK K Immanuel II act for Requestives, Questions (questions), Requirements (Prohibitives) ( prohibit)`
Full Text:
UntitledReferences
Abdul Chaer dan Leonie Agustina. 1995. Sosiolinguistik: pengenalan awal. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
Harimurti Kridalaksana. 1993. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta : PT Gramedia.
Ibrahim, Syukur. 1995. Sosiolinguistik. Surabaya:Usaha Nasional
Ismari. 1995. Tentang Percakapan. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI).
Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik (terjemahan M.D.D. Oka). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia
Jumadi. 2010. Wacana. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Prisma
Moleong, Lexy J. 2011. Metodologi
Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Paina Partana. (2009). Sosiolinguistik.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahardi, Kunjana. 2010. Pragmatik Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Rohmadi, Muhammad. 2004. Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Lingkar Media.
Rustono. 1999. Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press
Satori, Djam’an dan Aan Komariah. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:Penerbit Alfabeta.
Semi, M. Atar. 1990. Metode Penelitian Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa.
Sudjana, Nana dan Ibrahim. 1989. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Tarigan, Henri Guntur. 1990. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Yuniarti, 2010. Kompetensi Tindak Tutur Direktif Anak Usia Prasekolah (Kajian Pada Kelompok Bermain Anak Cerdas P2pnfi Regional Ii Semarang). Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
http://www.psychologymania.com/2012/06/pengertian-bermai
http://belajarpsikologi.com/metode-penelitian-kualitatif/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/ekha.v1i1.31568
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PUBLISHED BY:
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN (FKIP) UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA
Jurnal Edukasi Khatulistiwa : Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
e-ISSN : 2621-3788 (Online)
p-ISSN : 2656-1956 (Print)
Mailing Address
FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124
Telp: (0561) 740144 Kotak Post 1049
website: http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpbsi
email: jpbsi@untan.ac.id
Indexed by
Email: hemry@untan.ac.id
View My Stats