Model Penelitian Kebijakan Kualitatif Tohardi

Ahmad Tohardi

Abstract


Abstract

The Policy Research Model that uses the quantitative approach is more complicated and commonly used by a quantitative paradigm. Therefore, there must be the other alternative methods that simpler, more pragmatic, and effective methods but without decreasing the scientific values. In this paper, The researcher suggest that a qualitative research model called the Tohardis qualitative research model abbreviated as MPKKT. MPPKKT is designed by the conventional or classic model. They are 1. Pre survey using the naturalistic model in exploring the various problems., 2. Focus Group Discussion (FDG-1) is as a research formulating, 3. Focus Group Discussion (FGD-2) is as a policy formulation, 4. Expert Judgment is as an evaluation of an eligibility policy, 5. Discussion with the stakeholders in considering the policy output to implement it. MPKKT has been applied on the thesis research by the postgraduate students in Magister Program of Social Sciences in Fisip Untan. Based on the above application, here can be inferred that simple and more practical in implementing it. Besides, because it is used the social policy paradigm, it has a highly probability in implementing it by the users.

Key words: Policy Research, The Tohardis Qualitative Policy Research Model (MPKK).


Full Text:

PDF

References


Referensi

Agus, S. (2006). Teori & paradigma penelitian sosial. Edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana.

Anonimus. (2009). FGD tentang potensi konflik umat beragama di jawa tengah dan DIY. Diambil pada tanggal 2 Desember 1009 dari http:mediakeberagaman.com.

-------------. (2009) FGD Pluralisme “merapatkan barisan mengusung keragaman. Diambil pada tanggal 4 Desember 2009, dari http://abe-project.blog.frienster.com.

-------------. (2009) FGD Evaluation of communication materials.Diambil pada

tanggal 3 Desenber 2009 dari :http://en.wordpress.com/tag/fgd.

Bogdan,R., & Taylor,S.J. (1992). Pengantar metoda penelitian kualitatif. (Terjemahan Arief Furchan). (Judul asli: Introduction to qualitative research methodes a phenomenological approach to the social science. New York: John Wiley & Sons). Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research dalam Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research. New York: Sage Publications.

Djudju Sudjana. (2006). Evaluasi pendidikan luar sekolah untuk pendidikan nonformal dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Giddens, A. (1995). Kapitalisme dan teori sosial modern, suatu analisa karya tulis Marx, Durkheim dan Marx Weber. Jakarta:UI Press.

Irwanto. (2006). Focused group discussion. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Isa, W. (2006). Metodologi perencanaan partisipatif best practise untuk pelaksanaan musrenbang. Jakarta: MCW & YAPPIKA.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2th ed): Sage

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif, tata langkah dan teknik-teknik teoritisasi data. (Terjemahan Muhammad Shodiq & Imam Muttaqien). (Judul asli : Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudarwan, D. (2005). Pengantar studi penelitian kebijakan. Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara.

Zamroni. (1992). Pengantar pengembangan teori sosial. Yogyakarta: PT.Tiara Wacana.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpasdev.v1i1.41615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.