KONFLIK SOSIAL MASYARAKAT DENGAN PERUSAHAAN SAWIT ECAMATAN BATU AMPAR KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA

Endang Peryadi, Fatmawati Fatmawati, Pabali Musa

Abstract


Abstract

The research is related to the problem of Social Conflict between the Community and Palm Oil Company in Batu Ampar Sub-district, Kubu Raya Regency. The problem is why social tension occurs between the oil palm plantation company and the local community in Batu Ampar Sub-district. The theory used by Marx aims to describe the social conflict between the community and the owner of palm oil plantation company. The method used is descriptive research that aims to explain intensively about the research in question. It includes the background of the current situation, and the environmental interaction of a social unit: individuals, groups, institutions, or communities. The conclusion from the findings of this research about social conflict between PT. Fajar Saudara Lestari Oil Palm Plantation and the community of Batu Ampar Villages, Batu AMpar Sub-District, Kubu Raya Regency is expected to provide input to various parties. Social conflict between PT. Fajar Saudara Lestari Oil Palm Plantation and the community is due to changes in the socio-economic structure of the community from the capacity system through patterns for business. As a result of the entry o the oil palm plantation, there is a grouping of people over the structure of resources, including: groups that have the power of economic resources and groups that have social resources.

Key words : Social conflict, Oil Palm Plantation Farmers, Batu Ampar-Kubu Raya


Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Referensi

Buku

Angi, E. dan Catur, BW, (2001)., Praktek Pengelolaan Hutan Masyarakat Secara Tradisional di Kalimantan Timur.Majalah Kehutanan Indonesia Edisi II September 2001. Jakarta: Departemen Kehutanan.

Bee, R L. (1974). Patterns and Processes. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

Beilharz, P. (2003)., Teori-Teori Sosial. Observasi Kritis Terhadap Para Filosof Terkemuka. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Borras, S., M. Jr., RHl, Ian, S & Ben, W, and Wendy, W. (2011). Towards a Better Understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial.

Dahrendorf, R.( 1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Fakih, M. (2002). Runtuhnya Teori Pembangunan dan Globalisasi. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gidden, A.,Daniel,Bl, Forse, M.l, at all.( 2004). Sosiologi. Sejarah dan Berbagai Pemikirannya. Editor: Cabin Philippe dan Dortier Francois Jean. Yogyakarta: KreasiWacana.

Hadi, S. (2004). Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Hall, Derek, Philip Hirsch, and Tania Murray Li. 2011.Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

Honour T.F dan Mainwaring R.M. 1988.Sosiologi dan Bisnis. Jakarta: BinaAksara.

Kinloch C. Graham. 2009. Perkembangandan Paradigma Utama Teori Sosiologi. Cetakan II, bulan Januari. Bandung: CV. PustakaSetia.

Kortens, David C dan Rudi Klaus, Eds. 1984.People Centered Development. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

Miles dan BM, Huberman. 2002. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bandung: Bina Risda Karya.

Mubyarto, Sartono, Kartodirdjo. 1988. Pembangunan Pedesaan Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Nawawi, Hadari. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2007. Pembangunan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Putra, Nusa. 2009. Pemikiran Sujatmoko Tentang Kebebasan. Jakarta:Gramedia Utama.

Ritzer, George–Douglas Goodman.2004. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Ritzer, George. 2013. Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Cetakan Ke-10, bulan Maret. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

-----------------. 2014. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group

Sanafiah, Faisal. 2005. Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2013. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Cetakanke 5. Jakarta Rajawali.

-------------------------. 2013. Hukum Adat Indonesia .Cetakan Ke-13, bulan Juni. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. 2007. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1995. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Susan, Novri. 2009. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-Isu Konflik Kotemporer. Jakarta: KencanaPrenada Media Group.

----------------. 2009. Sosiologi Konflik Dan Isu-Isu Kontenporer. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Sztompka Piotr. 2004. Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Prenada.

Tjokrowinoto, Mulyarto. 1986. Alternatif Perencanaan Sosial Budaya dalam Sudjatmoko, et al, Masalah Sosial Budaya Tahun 2000. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Turner, Jonathan. 1978. From Utopia to Where? A Strategy for Reformulating the Dahrendorf Conflict Model.Social Forces.

Wallace & Wolf. 1995. Reading in Contemporary Socio Logical Theory From Modernity To Post-Modernity. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Wirawan. 2010. Konflik dan Manajemen Konflik. Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba.

Data, Publikasidan Internet:

Masrani. 2013. Tesis: Sengketa Tanah Perkebunan PT. Munteq Waniq Jaya Perkasa dengan Masyarakat Kampung Muara Tae Kecamatan Jempang Kabupaten Kutai Barat Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Pada Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Konsetrasi Agraria.Pdf.

Profil Kecamatan Batu Ampar, Kabupaten Batu Ampar, Tahun 2019. Diakses di Desa Batu Ampar, tanggal 20 Januari 2020.

Suharto, Edi. 2005. Konsep dan Strategi Pengentasan Kemiskinan menurut Prespektif Pekerja Sosial. www.policy.hu. Diakses di Pontianak, 21 Januari 2020. Pukul 09.30 WIB.

PeraturanPerundang-undangan:

Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar-dasar Pokok Agraria (UUPA).

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2005 tentang Desa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpasdev.v1i1.41498

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.