COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING MENGGUNAKAN DECISION MAKING PROBLEM BERBANTUAN VIRTUAL LABORATORY DI MTSN 9 KEDIRI

Yulianti Yusal, Azizah Anggi Maiyanti, Rizki Dwika Septiarini, Rahmawati Yanita Sari, Eva Alvi Laili

Abstract


One of the skills needed to face challenges and competition in the 21st century is decision making skills. This skill is important because in many complex situations, the ability to make appropriate and effective decisions is necessary. This research aims to find out how collaborative problem solving uses virtual laboratory-assisted decision making problems to train decision making skills. The method used was pre-experimental with one group pretest-posttest design. The research subjects were 40 students at MTsN 9 Kediri. The research instrument used is a decision making skill test in the form of a description consisting of indicators for determining criteria, explaining the advantages and disadvantages of each option, creating a decision matrix, and determining choices. The results of the analysis of the average N-gain value show a value of 0.73, meaning that students' decision making skills are in the high category. Thus, it can be concluded that collaborative problem solving using decision making problems assisted by a virtual laboratory is effective in improving students' decision making skills.

Keywords


Decision Making Skill; Collaborative Problem Solving; Virtual Laboratory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adesoji, F. A. (2008). Students’ Ability Levels and Effectiveness of Problem- Solving Instructional Strategy. J. Soc. Sci., 17 (1), 5-8.

Akinoglu, O. & Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The Effect of Problem-Based Active Learning in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude and Concept Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3 (1), 71-81.

Arlin, P. K. (1989). The problem of the problem. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday Problem solving: Theory and applications (hal.229–237). New York, NY: Praeger.

Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E. A., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). Teaching Students to Make Better Decisio About the Environment: Lessons From the Decision Sciences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33–44.

Arya, D. & Maul, A. (2016). The Building of Knowledge, Language, and Decision- Making about Climate Change Science: A Cross-National Program for Secondary Students. International Journal of Science Education.

Balta, N & Awedh, M. H. (2017). The Effect of Student Collaboration in Solving Physics Problems Using an Online Interactive Response System. European Journal of Educational Research, 6, 385 – 394.

Bernholt, S., Eggert, S., & Kulgemeyer, C.(2012).Capturing the diversity of students’ competences in science classrooms. Differences and commonalities of three complementary approaches, in Making It Tangible—Learning

Outcomes in Science Education, S. Bernholt, K. Neumann, & P. Nentwig, Eds., hal. 187–217, Waxmann, Münster, Germany. Binkley M, Erstad O, Herman J, Raizen S, Ripley M, Miller-Ricci M and Rumble

M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. Dalam P.Griffin, B. Mc Gaw, & E. Care (Penyunting). Assesment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (hlm. 17-66). New York: Spinger.

Bould, D, & Felleti, G. I. (1991). The challenge of problem-based learning. New York: Martin Press.

Chang, C.J. dkk.(2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations, Computers & Education, 114, 222-235.

Chang, H & Lee, H. (2010). College Students' Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context of Socioscientific Issues (SSI). J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, 30 (7), 887- 900.

Chattabud, J., Suwannoi, P., Sranamkam, T., Yuenyong, C. (2015). Thai Students’ Decision Making in Societal Issue of Surface Area and Concentrated Solutions as a Factor in the Rate of Chemical Reactions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (6).

Chen, L., Inoue, K., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2020). Exploring factors thatlinfuence collaborative problem solving awareness inlscience education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10758-020- 09436-8

Curtis, D.D. & Lawson, M.J. (2001).Exploring Collaborative Online Learning.

New York: Sloan Center for Online Education, 5, 21-34.

Dauer, J., Lute, M. & Straka, O. (2017). Indicators of Informal and Formal Decision-making about a Socioscientific Issue, International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5 (7).

Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (hal.207–226). Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.

Dermawan, R. (2006). Pengambilan Keputusan. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Dewi, A., Tika, N., & Suardana, I. N. (2019). Komparasi Praktikum Riil Dan Praktikum Virtualterhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Sma Pada Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 3(2), 85 93.

Dogru, M. (2008). The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science Teacher Traineer on Solution of Environmental Problems. Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3 (1), 9-18.

Duch, B. J. (1996). Problem Solving in Physics: The power of student teaching students. Journal of Culinaary Science Technology, 326-329.

Dunca, W. J. (1981). Organizational Behavior Second Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Eggert, S. & Bogeholz, S.(2010).Students’ Use of Decision-Making Strategies With Regard to Socioscientific Issues: An Application of The Rasch Partial Credit Model. Science Education, 94 (2), 230–258.

Eggert, S., Ostermeyer, F., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2012). Socioscientific decision making in the science classroom: the Effect of embedded metacognitive instructions on students’ learning outcomes. Education Research International. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2013/309894/

Evagorou, M,, Pilar, M., Aleixandre, J., & Osborne, J. (2012). Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’A Study Exploring Students’Justifications and Decision- Making. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (3), 401–428.

Fisher, A. (2009). Critical Thinking: Berpikir Kritis: Sebuah Pengantar. Penerjemah: Benyamin Hadinata. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Fujita, T, Doney, J. & Wegerif, R. (2019). Students’ collaborative decision-making processes in defining and classifying quadrilaterals: a semiotic/ dialogic approach, Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Fund, Z & Madjar, N. (2018).The influence of scaffolded computerised science problem solving on motivational aspects, International Journal of Science Education,152864.

Gaffar, A. A., & Sugandi, M. K. (2019). Pengembangan Media Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum Virtual untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biotek, 7(2), 96 110.

Gok, T. & Silay, I. (2008). Effect oProblem Solving Strategies Teaching on The Problem Solving Attitudes of Cooperative Learning Groups in Physics Education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4 (2).

Grace, M. & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The Science and Values That Young People Draw Upon to Make Decisions About Biological Conservation Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (11), 1157–1169.

Grace, M. (2009). Developing High Quality Decision-Making Discussions About Biological Conservation in a Normal Classroom Setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (4), 551–570.

Grace, M., Lee, Y. C., Asshoff, R., & Wallin, A. (2015). Student Decision-Making About A Globally Familiar Socioscientific Issue: The Value of Sharing and Comparing Views With International Counterparts. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (11), 1855–1874.

Gresch, H & Bögeholz, S.(2013). Identifying Non-Sustainable Course of Action: Prerequisite for Decision Making in Education for Sustainable Development. Res Sci Educ, 43, 733-754.

Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bogeholz, S (2015). Enhancing Decision-Making in STSE Education by Inducing Reflection and Self-Regulated Learning. Res Sci Educ.

Hadjichambi, D., P., Hadjichambis, A., C., & Konstantinos, K. (2015). How Students’ Values are Intertwined with Decisions in a Socio-scientific Issue. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10 (3), 493- 513.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64-74.

Harris, Robert.(2012). Introduction to Decision Making. Retrieved February 23td 2018, from https://virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm

Hikmah, N., Saridewi, N., & Agung, S. (2017). Penerapan laboratorium virtual untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 2(2), 186–195.

Hong, J., & Chang, N. (2004). Analysis Of Korean High School Students‘ Decision- Making Processes in Solving A Problem Involving Biological Knowledge. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 97–111.

Jackson, S.A. dkk. (2015). Decision Pattern Analysis as a General Framework for Studying Individual Differences in Decision Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(4), 392-408.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. (2002). Knowledge Producers Or Knowledge Consumers? Argumentation and Decision Making About Environmental Management. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (11), 1171–1190.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning To Solve Problems. Newyork: Routledge.

Joshi, M. (2017). Soft Skills 1st Edition. Bangalore: Senior Trainer Acharya Institute of English & Foreign Languages

Kadir, H. D., Arsyad, M., & Marisda, D. H.(2020). Implementation of problem solving methods in elasticity course. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 8 (3), 279-285. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jpf/article/view/3803/2761

Kelly, R., McLoughlin, E., & Finlayson, O. E. (2016). Analysing student written solutions to investigate if problemsolving processes rre evident throughout. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (11), 1766–1784. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/1 0.1080/09500693.2016.1214766

Kim, M., & Tan, H. T. (2013). A collaborative problem-solving process through environmental field studies. International Journal of Science Education , 35 (3), 357–387.

Kolsto, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students‘ argumentation confronted with a risk- focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (14), 1689–1716.

Kuo, E., Hallinen, N. R., & Conlin, L. K. (2017). When procedures discourage insight: epistemological consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education.13087.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2017.1308037

Leak, A.E., Rothwell, S.L., Olivera, J., Zwickl, B., Vosburg, J., &Martin, K.N. (2017). Examining Problem Solving in Physics-Intensive. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13 (2).

Lee, Y. C. & Grace, M. (2012). Student’s Reasoning and Decision Making About a Socioscientific Issue: A Cross-Context Comparison. Science Education, 96 (5), 787–807.

Lindahl, M. G. & Linder, C. (2015). What’s Natural About Nature? Deceptive Concepts In Socio Scientific Decision Making. European Journal of Science and Mathematccs Education, 3 (3), 250-264.

Maksum, A. H., & Saragih, Y. (2020). Analisis penerapan virtual laboratorium versus reality laboratorium. Jurnal Tiarsie, 17(2), 47–52

Malach, T. N., Meade, M. L. & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving, THINKING & REASONING, 2012, 18 (1), 32–58

McMurtry & Humphrey. (2000). Decision Making and Problem Solving: Pengambilan Keputusan dan Pemecahan Masalah. Penerjemah: Peni Rahmawati. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Mercier, E., & Higgins, S. (2014). Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multi-touch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 497–510.

Montjoye, Y. A. D., Stopczynski, A., Shmueli, E., Pentland, A., & Lehmann, S. (2014). The strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving, Scientific Reports, 4: 5277. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep05277?origin=ppub

Musyaillah, D. A., & Muhab, S. (2020). Pengaruh Integrasi Laboratorium Virtual dalam Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Materi Elektrolit dan Non elektrolit. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 10(1), 46–52.

Oliveri, M. E., Lawless, R., & Molloy, H. (2017). A literature review on collaborative problem solving for college and workforce readiness. ETS

Research Report Series, 2017(1). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/ 10.1002/ets2.12133

Palmiero, M., Nori, R., Piccardi, L. & D’Amico, S. (2020). Divergent Thinking: The Role of Decision-Making Styles, Creativity Research Journal.

Papadouris, N. (2012). Optimization as a Reasoning Strategy for Dealing With Socionscientific Decision-Making Situation. Science Education, 96 (4), 600–630.

Paul, R.W. & Elder, L. (2002). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life [Adobe Digital Editions version].

Pratiwi, D., Astutik, S., Maryani. (2018) Model Pembelajaran Collaborative Creativity (Cc) Berbantuan Virtual Laboratory Pad) Pembelajaran Fisika Di Sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika. 7(3). 229-234

Presseisen, B. Z. (2001). Thinking Skills: Meanings and Models Revisted. Dalam Costa, Arthur (Penyunting). Developing of Minds. (hlm. 47-53). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Putri, A. S., & Aznam, N. (2019). The effect of the science web module integrated on batik’s local potential towards students’ critical thinking and problem solving (thinking skill). Journal of Science Learning, 2 (3), 92-96. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jslear ning/article/view/34

Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Pupil Decision-Making About Socio-Scientific Issues Within the Science Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (2), 167–182.

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.

Santrock, J.W.2008. Educational Psycology, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill Company. Seethaler, S., & Linn, M. (2004). Genetically Modified Food in Perspective: An

Inquiry-Based Curriculum to Help Middle School Students Make Sense of Tradeoffs. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (14), 1765–1785. Selcuk, G.S, Caliskan, S., & Erol, M. (2008). The Effect Problem Solving Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem Solving Performance and Strategy Use. Lat. Am. J. Phy. Educ., 2 (3).

Siegel, M. (2006). High School Students’ Decision Making About Sustainability.

Environmental Education Research, 12 (2), 201–215.

Siribunnam, S., Nuangchalerm, P., & Jansawang N. (2014). Socio-scientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 5 (4).

Stapleton, P. (2018). Avoiding cognitive biases: promoting good decision making in research methods courses, Teaching In Higher Education, 1470-1294.

Swartz, R. J.(2001). Thinking About Decision. Dalam Costa, Arthur (Penyunting). Developing of Minds. (hlm. 58-66). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tekbiyik, A. (2015). The use of jigsaw collaborative learning method in teaching socioscientific issues: the case of nuclear energy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14 (2). http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=n ode/428

Walker, M. (2013). Evaluating the Intervention of an Ethics’ Class in Students’ Ethical Decision-Making: A Summative Review. International Education Studies, 6 (1).

Wood, D. (2003). Problem Based Learning: ABC of Learning and Teaching in Medicine. [Online]. Tersedia pada

http//www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7384/328/[24 Maret 2018]

Wulandari, N., & Vebrianto, R. (2017). Studi literatur pembelajaran kimia berbasis masalah ditinjau dari kemampuan menggunakan laboratorium virtual. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Dan Industri, 709–715

Yanti, Y., Marzuki, Y., Sawitri, Y., (2020) Meta-Analisis: Pengaruh Media Virtual Laboratory Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Terhadap Kompetensi Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika. 6 (2). 146-154

Yuenyong, C. (2012). Thai Students’ Decision Making about Energy Issues: The Influence of Local Values. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, hal. 5045-5057.

Yusal, Y., Suhandi, A., Setiawan, W. & Kaniawati, I. (2021). Profile of pre-service physics teacher’s critical thinking skills related to heat transfer. Journal of Physics: Conferences Series, 1157 032071.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/gm.v43i1.81919

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Guru Membangun



Diterbitkan Oleh:

Ikatan Keluarga Alumni FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura

Pontianak

This work is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0