The Impacts Of Environmental Disclosure On Performance Of PT Elnusa Tbk

Hana Dhayan B1034141016

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to know the extent of environmental disclosure in company’s performance and sustainability. This research is conducted as qualitative analysis. This research used 8 years of annual reports and articles to be content analyzed. Findings reveal that environmental disclosure doesn’t contribute much on PT Elnusa Tbk’s performance but it sets certain standard for company’s environmental sustainability. Environmental disclosure by PT Elnusa Tbk becomes its own standard in order to keep the sustainability. Environmental disclosure acts as added value in the annual report to the stakeholders. However, the increasing disclosure trends can be considered as a first step toward improved environmental disclosure. The research therefore supports the the need for a suitable framework for environmental disclosure, such that all the stakeholders can use it as credible information.

 

Keywords: environment, disclosure, performance, sustainability

 

Adams, C. A., Hill, W. and Roberts, C. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour. British Accounting Review, 30(1): 1-21.

Adams, C.A.; McNicholas, P. (2002). Making a difference. Sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 20, 382–402

Adams, C., Burritt, R., Frost, G. (2008). Integrated Approaches to Environmental

Sustainability. British Accounting Review, 40(2): 1-26.

Ahmadi, A., & Bouri, A.(2017). The relationship between financial attributes,

environmental performance and environmental disclosure: Empirical

investigation on French firms listed on CAC 40. Management of

Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(4), pp.490-506.

Avram & Avasilcai, S. (2016). Framing the Competitive Behaviors of Niche Players: the Electric Vehicle Business Ecosystem Perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 342 – 351.

Bracci, E., & Maran, L. (2013). Environmental Management and Regulation: Pitfalls of Environmental Accounting? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24 (4), pp. 538 – 554.

Campbell, D., Craven, B. and Shrives, P. (2003). Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), pp. 558-81.

Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse

Researcher, 4(3), 5-16.

Carroll, A. (1979). A three - dimensional conceptual model of corporate

performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), pp.497 - 505.

Chandok, R.I.S., & Singh, S. (2017). Empirical study on determinants of environmental disclosure: Approach of selected conglomerates. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), pp.332-355.

Charl, d. V., & Chris, v. S. (2012). New Zealand Shareholder Attitudes Towards Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 24 (2), pp. 186 – 210.

Cho, C., Patten, D. and Roberts, R. (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), pp. 139-154.

Cho, R.W., Song, Y., & Littleton, J. T. (2010) Comparative Analysis of Drosophila and Mammalian Complexins as Fusion Clamps and Facilitators of Neurotransmitter Release. Mollecular and Cellular Neurosciences, 45(4), 389 – 397.

De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. (2012). New Zealand shareholder attitudes

towards corporate environmental disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review,

24(2), pp.186-210.

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 9 (2), pp. 50 – 67.

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability, 10 (4), pp.562-583.

Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Social Incidents: Australia Evidence , Accounting Forum, 24 (1), pp. 101- 130.

Deegan, C. (2000), Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw Hill Book Company,

Sydney.

Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimizing Effect of Social and Environmental

Disclosures- A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing and

Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 282-311.

Deegan, C. & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure policies

of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), pp.

187-99.

Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information

to users of annual reports.  Accounting, Auditing and AccountabilityJournal,

10(4), pp. 562-83.

Deegan, C.,  Rankin, M.  and Voght, P.   (2000).  Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to

Social Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), pp. 101-

130.

Deegan, C. , Rankin, M.  and Tobin, J.  (2002).  An Examination of the Corporate

Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A Test of

Legitimacy    Theory.    Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,

15(3), pp. 312-43.

Djajadikerta, H.G., & Trireksani, T. (2012). Corporate social and environmental

disclosure by  Indonesian  listed companies  on their corporate web sites.

Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(1), pp.21-36.

Dosinta,  N.  F.,     Brata,     H.,     & Heniwati, E.     (2017).    Implikasi Legitimacy

Theory Dalam CSR  Bank    Kalbar   Untuk   Peningkatan Kualitas SDM di

Kalimantan Barat. In S. . Panjaitan, N. Bariyah, & Z. Zain (Eds.), Prosiding

Seminar Nasional Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (PIPT) (pp.

5–16). Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.

Enrico Bracci,  E.,  Laura Maran,  L.   (2013).   Environmental management and

regulation:   pitfalls   of  environmental  accounting? .    Management of

Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(4), pp.538-554.

Fallan, E. (2015). Explaining the variation in adoption rates of the information content of environmental disclosure: An exploration of innovation adoption  theory. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(2), pp.247-268.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. N

Y Times Mag (32–33), pp.122–126.

Frost, G. R. (2007). The Introduction of Mandatory Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Australian Evidence. Abacus, 43(2), pp.190-216.

 

Giordano-spring, S., Cahuvey, J., Cho, C., & Patten, D. (2015). The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics 2015, 130 (4), 789 – 803.

Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), pp. 78-101.

Gray, R., Javad, M., Porter, D.M. & Sinclair, C.D. (2001) “Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, (3-4), 327-356.

Guthrie and Parker. (1989). Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19, 343 – 352.

Hassan, A., Guo, X. (2017). The relationships between reporting format,

environmental disclosure and environmental performance: An empirical

study. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(4), pp.425-444.

Holmes, S. (1976). Executive perception of corporate social responsibility.

Business Horizons, (19), pp. 34-40.

IIRC 2013. Availabe online at : http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/IR-Discussion-Paper-2011_spreads.pdf [Accessed 03 May 2017]

IIRC 2014. Available online at: http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Consultation-Draft-of-theInternationalIRFramework.pdf [Accessed 02 May 2017]

Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach. Business Strategic and the Environment, 21, pp. 299 – 316.

Khlif, H., Guidara, A., Souissi, M. (2015). Corporate social and environmental

disclosure and corporate performance: Evidence from South Africa and

Morocco. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(1), pp.51-69.

KPMG International. “KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility

Reporting20011.”www.kpmg.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/International-corporateresponsibility-survey-2008_v2.pdf.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis An Introduction to Its Methodology.

Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Li, Y., Thornton, D. B., & Gordon , R. (1997). Corporate Disclosure of Environmental Liability Information: Theory and Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435 – 474.

Miles, Samantha (2011). Stakeholder Definitions: Profusion and  Confusion. EIASM 1st interdisciplinary conference on stakeholder, resources and value creation, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Barcelona.

Miles, Samantha.         (2012).            Stakeholders :   essentially    contested or just

confused?. Journal of Business Ethics108 (3), pp. 285–298.

Milne, M., Patten, D. (2001). Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental

decision case examining the impact of ED. APIRA Conference, pp.1-44.

Murray, A.,Sinclair,  D., Power, D., Gray, R.  (2006). Do  financial  markets   care

about    social      and  environmental  disclosure? :  Further  evidence  and

exploration from the UK.   Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,

19(2), pp.228-255

Nor, N. M., Bahari, N.A.S., Adnan, N.A., Kamal, S.M.Q.A.S., Ali, I.M. (2015).

The Effects of Environmental Disclosure on Financial Performance in

Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(7), pp.117 – 126.

OECD, Principles of Corporate Governance (Paris: OECD, 2012), available online at: www.oecd.org/daf/corporateaffairs/principles/text. [Accessed 02 May 2017]

O’Donovan, G. (1999). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability,15 (3), pp.344 – 371.

Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10 (4), 297 – 308.

Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 17 (5), 471 – 475.

Perry, M., Singh, S. 2011. Corporate environmental responsibility in Singapore and

Malaysia:   The potential and limits of voluntary initiatives.   Technology,

Business and Society Programme Paper, 3, 135-137.

Sen, M., Mukherjee, K., Pattanayak, J.K. (2011). Corporate environmental

disclosure practices in India. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,

12(2), pp.139-156.

Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. New Jersey,

Merrill: Prentice Hall.

Solomon, J.F., & Solomon, A. (2006). Private social, ethical and environmental

disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), pp.564-

591.

Smith, M., Yahya, K., Amiruddin, A.M. (2007). Environmental disclosure and

performance reporting in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2),

pp.185-199.

Walden, D. & Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125 – 154.

Wilmhurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 13(1), pp.10-26.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi UNTAN (KIAFE)

Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Tanjungpura

Jl. Prof.Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak - Kalimantan Barat (78121)

Phone : (0561) 785342, 583865

Email : kiafe@untan.ac.id