USING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE STUDENTS' SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN STEM LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Abstract
Using portfolio assessment to enhance students’ science process skills was potentially impactful in the STEM learning activities. Its benefits to navigate students gaining comprehensive experiences is necessary. The objective of this study was to examine portfolio assessment in enhancing students' science process skills in STEM learning activities. A quantitative research approach was implemented, with a sample of 33 students between the ages of 14 and 16, drawn from Indonesian public senior high schools. The instrument used to collect the data was a test. It consisted of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The findings reveal key indicators of science process skills in STEM learning activities, identifying portfolios that influence students' engagement and understanding within the STEM learning activities. Importantly, this study highlights the critical role of encouraging students to ask questions, as it can significantly enhance their science process skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and Assessment Methods: STEM Teachers' Perceptions and Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6).
Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & De Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88.
Alston, M. (2020). Research for social workers: An introduction to methods: Routledge.
Astuti, N. H., Rusilowati, A., & Subali, B. (2021). STEM-based learning analysis to improve students’ problem solving abilities in science subject: A literature review. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 10(1), 79-86.
Ata-Aktürk, A., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2021). Supporting preschool children’s STEM learning with parent-involved early engineering education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 607-621.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2020). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge: Routledge.
Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503-529.
Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning. In (Vol. 27, pp. 319-331): Taylor & Francis.
Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8-12.
Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5-13.
Chan, M. M., & Holbert, N. (2020). Insights on Online Mobile Maker Portfolios for Process Documentation in K-5 Constructionist Learning Environments. Proceedings of Constructionism 2020.
Chere-Masopha, J., & Mothetsi-Mothiba, L. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using a portfolio for teaching, learning, and assessment in Lesotho primary schools. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2023969.
Costa, M. C., Domingos, A., & Teodoro, V. (2020). Promoting integrated STEM tasks in the framework of teachers’ professional development in Portugal. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective, 511-532.
Ekoto, C., Zubkov, P., & Asok, G. (2022). Qualitative data collection. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in the asian context, 345-363.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), 2.
Hall, R. P., & Hall, R. (2020). Mixing methods in social research: qualitative, quantitative and combined methods: Sage.
Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The Effect of Blended Learning on Student's Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521-538.
Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000.
Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772.
Inayah, A. D., Ristanto, R. H., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2020). Analysis of science process skills in senior high school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 15-22.
Kim, C. E. (2020). STEM Teachers' Beliefs and ESOL Professional Development. ORTESOL Journal, 37, 63-70.
Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2019). Students’ beliefs regarding the use of e-portfolio to enhance cognitive skills in a Blended Learning Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 14(2), 85.
Larkin, K. M., & Lowrie, T. (2022). STEM education in the early years: Thinking about tomorrow: Springer.
Liu, Y. (2022). Paradigmatic compatibility matters: A critical review of qualitative-quantitative debate in mixed methods research. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440221079922.
Lorsbach, A. (2002). The Learning Cycle as A Tool for Planning Science Instruction. Retrieved Desember 10, 2002, from http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy.html.
McCurdy, R. P., Nickels, M. L., & Bush, S. B. (2020). Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM. The electronic journal for research in science & mathematics education, 24(2), 22-55.
Morris, J., Song, Y., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2021). Teacher professional development in STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(4).
Normayanti, E., Abdurrahman, A., & Herlina, K. (2020). Exploring teacher perception about STEM learning material to foster students understanding of dispersion concept. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Oferdahl, E., & Impey, C. (2012). Assessing General Education Science Courses: A Portfolio Approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(5).
Okulu, H. Z., & Oguz-Unver, A. (2021). The Development and Evaluation of a Tool to Determine the Characteristics of STEM Activities. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 6.
Priatna, N., Martadipura, B., & Lorenzia, S. (2019). Development of mathematic’s teaching materials using project-based learning integrated STEM. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Sagala, R., Rofiqul, U., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753-761.
Salmona, M., Lieber, E., & Kaczynski, D. (2019). Qualitative and mixed methods data analysis using Dedoose: A practical approach for research across the social sciences: Sage Publications.
Shidiq, G. A., & Faikhamta, C. (2020). Exploring the relationship of teachers' attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge towards integrated STEM. Ilkogretim Online, 19(4).
Shin, S., Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Ha, M., & Lee, J.-K. (2018). Career motivation of secondary students in STEM: a cross-cultural study between Korea and Indonesia. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 18, 203-231.
Sukmayadi, V., & Yahya, A. (2020). Indonesian education landscape and the 21st century challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 219-234.
Thi To Khuyen, N., Van Bien, N., Lin, P.-L., Lin, J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1531.
Wahono, B., Lin, P.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-18.
Yata, C., Ohtani, T., & Isobe, M. (2020). Conceptual framework of STEM based on Japanese subject principles. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v15i1.72228
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Abstracted/Indexed by:
PUBLISHED BY:
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License