A COMMOGNITIVE STANDPOINT: THE PROCESS OF PROBLEM-SOLVING IN POLYHEDRON

Fita Nuril Azizah; Eka Resti Wulan; Dwi Shinta Rahayu

doi:10.26418/jpmipa.v14i2.56141

A COMMOGNITIVE STANDPOINT: THE PROCESS OF PROBLEM-SOLVING IN POLYHEDRON

Fita Nuril Azizah, Eka Resti Wulan, Dwi Shinta Rahayu

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ commognitive in the process of solving the problem in polyhedron, based on the four stages of Polya. This study uses an approach with a descriptive type of research. The instruments used in this study were in the form of problem solving test questions and interview guidelines. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII in one of the schools in the Nganjuk district. The result of this research is that at each stage of problem solving students use cognitive components. Narrative components that affect students' success in solving problems, as seen in the results of subject answers. This shows that narrative has an important role in the problem solving process. The narrative component is related to understanding mathematical concepts, so it is hoped that in learning students can understand concepts. The results of this study indicate that students are still more focused the final solution and attention to an important component in the problem solving process, in this case is the commognitive component.

Keywords

Commognitive, Problem Solving, Polyhedron

Full Text:

PDF

References

Emanuel, E. P. L., & Meilantifa. (2022). Dimanakah Nilai Ekstrim Fungsi Kuadrat Ditinjau dari Lensa Commognitive ? BRILIANT Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 7(54), 269–279.

Fatmawati, F., & Murtafiah. (2018). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Kelas XI Sma Negeri 1 Majene. JURNAL SAINTIFIK, 4(1), 63–73.

Islamiah, N., Purwaningsih, W. E., Akbar, P., & Bernard, M. (2018). Analisis hubungan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan self confidence siswa smp. 47–57.

Kusumaningtyas, S. I., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2017). Pemecahan Masalah Generalisasi Pola Siswa Kelas VII SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independendt Dan Field. 8(1), 76–84.

Mudaly, V., & Mpofu, S. (2019). Learners’ Views On Asymptotes Of A Hyperbola And Exponential Function: A Commognitive. Problems Of Education In The 21st Century, 77(6).

Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: the case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(December), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338

NCTM. (2000). Principles Standards and for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Rahmmatiya, R., & Miatun, A. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis ditinjau dari resiliensi matematis siswa smp. Teorema Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(September), 187–202.

Roberts, A., & Roux, K. (2018). A commognitive perspective on Grade 8 and Grade 9 learner thinking about linear equations. Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 1–15.

Rossydha, F., Nusantara, T., & Sukoriyanto. (2021). Commognitive Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Persamaan Linier Satu Variabel. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2008, 1–9.

Setyo, A., Lestari, B., Nusantara, T., Chandra, T. D., & Irfan, M. (2019). Commognitive Analysis of Students Difficulty In Solving Fractional Problems. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 467(Semantik), 110–115.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as Communicating Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.

Sunandar, M. A., Zaenuri, & Dwidayati, N. K. (2018). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Of Vocational School Students On Problem Based Learning Model Nuanced Ethnomatematics Reviewed From Adversity Quotient. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(345), 1–8.

Thoma, A. (2018). Transition from School to University Mathematics : Manifestations of Unresolved Commognitive Conflict in First Year Students ’ Examination Scripts. 161–180.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i2.56141