THE CONTRIBUTION OF TOULMIN'S ARGUMENTATION PATTERNS IN PHYSICS LEARNING IN INDONESIA: LITERATURE REVIEW

Mohd Zaidi Bin Amiruddin, Eka Putri Dian Nata Sari, Uci Vebia Paramita, Suliyanah Suliyanah, Setyo Admoko

Abstract


This research is a descriptive research using literature study method which aims to analyze how far is the contribution of Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) in learning physics in Indonesia. The data collection technique used is a review of articles from previous studies related to the application of Toulmin's argument in learning physics. Sources of data used four articles in this research is secondary data. The data obtained were then analyzed using the, organize method, namely organizing the articles to be reviewed, synthesize, which combines the results of organizing articles into an integrated literature,  Identify, which is to identify articles to draw conclusions. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the application of Toulmin's Argumentation in learning Physics in Indonesia has many contributions such as in mastering concepts, problem solving abilities, and especially in improving students' argumentation skills. It is also known that the application of the argumentation-based learning model should be collaborated with problem-based learning models and discussion methods to train students' argument structure preparation. So, for build good argumentation skills, directed teaching is needed by utilizing Toulmin's argumentation pattern.


Keywords


Descriptive Research; Literature Review; Toulmin’s Argument

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiruddin, M. Z. B., Sari, E. P. D. N., Arrafi, W. Q. L., Ma’arif, M. S., & Admoko, S. (2022). The Development of Student Worksheet Based on STEM Integrated Blended Learning to Improve Student's Science Argumentation Skills in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 135-144.

Anwarudin, G.Z., & Admoko, S. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelas untuk Meningkatkan Argumentasi Ilmiah Materi Getaran Harmonis. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 8(3): 804-809

Azmi, M.K., Rahayu, S., & Hikmawati. (2016). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning dengan Metode Eksperimen dan Diskusi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Kelas X MIPA SMAN 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2(2): 86-94

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612.

Beddu, S. (2019). Implementasi Pembelajaran Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 1(3), 71-84.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

Dwikoranto, D. (2022). Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern on Problem Solving Model to Improve Problem-Solving Analysis Ability: Learning Alternatives During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Ijorer: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(2), 200-209.

Dywan, A. A., & Airlanda, G. S. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis Stem dan Tidak Berbasis Stem Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2), 344-354

Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y.H. & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui PBL (Problem Based Learning). Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2).

Erduran, S. (2018). Toulmin’s Argument Pattern as a “Horizon of Possibilities” In the Study of Argumentation in Science Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1091-1099.

Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, MP (2008). Argumentation in Science Education Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. Https://Doi.Org/10.12973/Ejmste/80353

Herayanti, L., & Habibi, H. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Simulasi Komputer untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1(1), 61-66.

Hidayah, A. N., Winingsih, P. J., Amalia, A. F. (2020). Development Of Physics E-Lkpd (Electronic Worksheets) using 3d Pageflip Based on Problem Based Learning on Balancing and Rotation Dynamics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika-COMPTON, 7(2), 36-43

Indrawati, F. A., & Wardono, W. (2019, February). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Pembentukan Kemampuan 4c. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, Pp. 247-267).

Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Berbasis Pola Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dan Diskusi pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 9(3), 318-324

Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno., & Nasikhudin. (2021). Identifikasi Kualitas Argumentasi Imiah Siswa SMA pada Termodinamika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan. 6(9), 1436-1446

Kurniasari, I. S. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 171-174

Kusumastuti, R.P., Rusilowati, A. & Nugroho, S.E. (2019). Pengaruh Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis terhadap Literasi Sains Siswa. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(3), 254-261.

Mubarok, O. S., Muslim, M., & Danawan, A. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA pada Materi Pengukuran. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 3(1), 381–388.

Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitive and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. American Association for the Advanement of Science AAAS. 328: 463-466.

Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific Argument and Explanation: A Necessary Distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638

Paramita, A.K., Dasna, I.W. & Yahmin, Y., (2019). Kajian Pustaka: Integrasi Stem untuk Keterampilan Argumentasi Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 4(2), 92-99.

Pertiwi, A. D., Nurfatimah, S. A., & Hasna, S. (2022). Menerapkan Metode Pembelajaran Berorientasi Student Centered Menuju Masa Transisi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 8839-8848.

Prasetyawati, P. (2016). Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Berbasis Student Centered Learning dalam Pendekatan Saintifik pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah di SMA Negeri se-Kota Palu. Katalogis, 4(10), 130-137

Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018, September). Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, P. 012147). IOP Publishing.

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34-42.

Putri, R. E. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP Kelas VII Melalui Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu dengan Tema HALO pada Topik Kalor. SEMESTA: Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 1(1), 34.

Rhosalia, L. A. (2017). Pendekatan Saintifik (Scientific Approach) dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 Versi 2016. JTIEE (Journal Of Teaching In Elementary Education), 1(1), 59-77.

Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Optik: Problem-Based Learning Berbantuan Edu-Media Simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53.

Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56-66.

Sari, N. A., & Yuniastuti, Y. (2018). Penerapan Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(12), 1572-1582.

Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4C Abad 21 dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(2), 107-117.

Suganda, T., Parno., & Sunaryono. (2021). Identifikasi Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Topik Gelombang Bunyi dan Cahaya. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan. 6(9): 1413-1417

Sugandi, S. R. (2015). Pengaruh Penggunaan Pola Argumentasi Toulmin pada Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Metode Diskusi terhadap Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kualitas Argumentasi Sains Siswa SMA (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Toulmin, C. (1984). The Allocation of Resources to Livestock Research in Africa. ILCA LPU Working Paper.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Widhi, M. T. W., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik pada Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) Dalam Memahami Konsep Fisika dengan Metode Library Research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79-91.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55338

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted/Indexed by:

S3    


PUBLISHED BY:

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats