ALGEBRA PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY BASED ON SOLO TAXONOMY ASSESSED FROM COGNITIVE STYLE

Arie Purwa Kusuma, S B Waluya, Rochmad Rochmad, S Mariani

Abstract


Algebra is a branch of mathematics that uses mathematical statements to describe the relationship between various things. This study aims to describe the algebra problem solving abilities of students in the Linear Program course. There are differences in student problem solving, which are caused by students' cognitive styles. Reflective and impulsive cognitive styles based on the SOLO taxonomy. This research method is descriptive qualitative. The research was conducted at STKIP Kusuma Negara Jakarta. The research subjects consisted of 4 students, 2 students having a reflective cognitive style and 2 students having an impulsive style. Purposive sampling technique was used in taking the subjects.Data collection techniques used cognitive style test questions Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT), algebra problem solving test questions and interview guidelines. Data collection techniques used two techniques, namely written tests and interviews. Technical analysis of data by reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. From the data processing, the results of the research were 2 students whose have flexible cognitive style also have good algebra problem solving abilities and based on SOLO taxonomy reached the Extended abstract level. Meanwhile, students who have an impulsive cognitive style in solving algebra problems based more on the SOLO taxonomy have Multistructural and Unistructural levels. So each cognitive style of students gives the different results in solving problems.


Keywords


Algebra problem solving; Reflexive and Impulsive; SOLO taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agoestanto, Arief, & Y. L. Sukestiyarno. (2019). "The Position and Causes of Students Errors in Algebra Thinking Based on Cognitive Style." International Journal of Instruction 12.1: 1431-1444.

Andriani, P. (2015). Penalaran Aljabar Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Beta - Scandinavian Journal of Business Research, 8(1), 1–15.

Ariawan, B. (2015). Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Program Linear Menggunakan Geogebra. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan, (pp. 69–85).

Caniglia J. C. & Meadows M 2018 Australian. Journal of Teacher Education 43 (9) 75- 89.

Claudia, L. F., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2020, May). The SOLO taxonomy: classify students’ responses in solving linear program problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1538, No. 1, p. 012107). IOP Publishing.

Hamdani, A.S. (2009). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Taksonomi SOLO. 1(1), Juni.

Hodges, L. C., & Harvey, L. C. (2003). Evaluation of student learning in organic chemistry using the SOLO taxonomy. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(7), 785.

Irawati, Sri. (2015). "Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa calon guru matematika dalam memecahkan masalah program linier." Sigma 1.1: 29-34.

Ilgüy, M., Ilgüy, D., Fişekçioğlu, E., & Oktay, I. (2014). Comparison of case‐based and lecture‐based learning in dental education using the SOLO taxonomy. Journal of dental education, 78(11), 1521-1527.

Kagan, J. (1965). Reflective and Impulsive Children: Significance of Conceptual Tempo. In J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.), Learning and the Educational Process. Chicogo: Rand Mc Nally & Company.

Kholid, M. (2011). Analisa Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Mata Kuliah Program Linear (Studi pada Mahasiswa Semestar IV Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 160-169.

Khairunnisa, M. (2020). Product assessment of mathematical representation ability viewed from student’s cognitif style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, No. 3, p. 032019). IOP Publishing.

Kusuma, A. P. (2017). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division dan Team Assisted Individualization ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Siswa. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 135-144.

Kusuma, A. P., Rahmawati, N. K., & Ramadoni, R. (2020). The Application of the Accelerated Learning Cycle, Brain-based Learning Model, and Direct Instruction Model toward Mathematical Reasoning in Terms of Mathematical Communication. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 21-28.

Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737-750.

Prasetyowati, D., & Kartinah, K. (2019). Berpikir Reflektif Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pgri Semarang Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent. Jurnal Silogisme: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 3(2), 43-47.

Rahmawati, N. K., & Hanipah, I. R. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 43-48.

Rahmawati, N. K., & Amah, A. (2018). The differences of the student learning outcome using realistic mathematics learning approaches (PMR) and contextual learning approaches (CTL) on the Sets Material. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 63-71.

Salido, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Muhafidin, I. (2020). Mathematical reflective thinking strategy in problem-solving viewed by cognitive style. JPhCS, 1469(1), 012150.

Septiani, D. (2020). Analyzing students’ representation ability: viewed from reflective-impulsive cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1538, No. 1, p. 012105). IOP Publishing.

Satriawan, M. A., Budiarto, M. T., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Students’ relational thinking of impulsive and reflective in solving mathematical problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing.

Simuth, J and Schuller, I V 2014 5th World Conference on Educational-WCES 2013.

Simamora, R. (2020). Model realistic mathematic education ditinjau dari aspek kemampuan pemecahan masalah aljabar. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 22-29.

Syahlan. (2017). Sepuluh strategi dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, Vol. 4 (6), 358-369.

Syawahid, M., & Nurhardiani, N. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 17-26.

Utami, R. E., & Indriana, K. (2018). Metacognitive ability of male students: difference impulsive-reflective cognitive style. In Journal of Physics Conference Series (Vol. 983, No. 1, p. 012118).

Wahyuni, A. (2017). Analisis Hambatan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Dasar. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(1), 10-23.

Widada, W., Sunardi, H., Herawaty, D., Pd, B. E., & Syefriani, D. (2018). Abstract level characteristics in SOLO taxonomy during ethnomathematics learning. J. Sci. Res., 7(8), 352-355.

Widadah, S., Afifah, D. S. N., & Pos, J. J. K. (2013). Profil Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo, 1(1), 13-24.

Wilson, S., & Janes, D. P. (2008). Mathematical Self-Efficacy: How Constructivist Philosophies Improve Self-Efficacy.Journal of the Saskatchewan Mathematics Teachers’ Society 1(1).

Windsor, W. (2010). Algebra Thinking: A Problem-Solving Approach. In Shaping the future of mathematics education. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v12i2.44911

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted/Indexed by:

S3    


PUBLISHED BY:

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura
IN COOPERATION WITH
Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (PPII)

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats