HUBUNGAN ANTARA LITERASI EKOLOGI DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH LINGKUNGAN DI SEKOLAH ADIWIYATA KOTA TANGERANG

Lenny Prastiwi; Diana Vivanti Sigit; Rizhal Hendi Ristanto

doi:10.26418/jpmipa.v11i1.31593

HUBUNGAN ANTARA LITERASI EKOLOGI DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH LINGKUNGAN DI SEKOLAH ADIWIYATA KOTA TANGERANG

Lenny Prastiwi, Diana Vivanti Sigit, Rizhal Hendi Ristanto

Abstract

The environmental problem-solving skill is influenced by many factors, including ecological literacy. This study aims to analyze the relationship between ecological literacy and environmental problem-solving skill in the Adiwiyata school of Tangerang City. The research method that used was quantitative descriptive with survey technique. The number of respondents consisted of 245 students of grade 11^th Science from three Adiwiyatas' Senior High Schools in Tangerang City. Ecological literacy was measured by using test and questionnare, while the environmental problem-solving skill was measured using an essay test. The results showed that there was a weak positive relationship through the regression model Ŷ = -18,084 + 0,877X. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.382 and the determination coefficient was 14.6%. The higher score of the ecological literacy, so the students' environmental problem-solving skill will be better. Based on the results of the study, other schools also need to implement Adiwiyata programs in order to ecological literacy and students' environmental problem-solving skills could be better.

ABSTRAK

Kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, termasuk literasi ekologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara literasi ekologi dengan kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan di sekolah Adiwiyata, Kota Tangerang. Metode penelitian yaitu deskriptif kuantitatif dengan teknik survey. Jumlah sampel pada penelitian ini sebanyak 245 kelas 11 IPA yang berasal dari 3 sekolah Adiwiyata di Kota Tangerang. Literasi ekologi diukur dengan menggunakan tes dan kuesioner, sementara kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan diukur dengan menggunakan tes essai. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan dengan tingkatan yang lemah melalui model regresi Ŷ = -18,084 + 0,877X. Koefisien korelasi yang diperoleh sebesar 0.382 dan koefisien determinasi sebesar 14.6%. Semakin tinggi skor literasi ekologi maka kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan siswa akan semakin baik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, sekolah lain perlu mengimplementasikan Program Adiwiyata sebagai upaya agar terbentuk literasi ekologi dan kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan yang lebih baik.

Kata kunci: sekolah Adiwiyata, literasi ekologi, lingkungan, kemampuan memecahkan masalah

Keywords

Adiwiyata school; ecological literacy; environment; problem-solving skill

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbas, M. Y. & Singh, R. (2012). A survey of environmental awareness, attitude, and participation amongst university students: A case study. International Journal of Science and Research. 3(5), 1755-1760. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i5/ MDIwMTMyMTg3.pdf

Adela, D., Sukarno, & Indriayu, M. (2018). Integration of environmental education at the Adiwiyata program recipient school in growing ecoliteracy of students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 262, 67-71. doi: 10.2991/ictte-18.2018.11

Azrai, E. P., Sigit, D. V., & Puji, M. (2017). The correlation between environmental awareness and student’s participation in go green school activity at adiwiyata’s school. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 7-11, from: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-2.

Azrai, E. P., Ernawati, E., & Sulistianingrum, G. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar David Kolb (Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, Accommodator) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 9-16.

Badoni, A. K. (2017). Study of environmental awareness of secondary Level Student. International education & research journal (IERJ), 3 (2), 7-8. Retrieved from ierj.in/journal/ index.php/ierj/article/download/686/6.

Berkowitz A, Brewer C, & McBride B. (2008). Essential elements of ecological literacy and the pathways needed for all citizens to achieve it. Paper presented at: 93rd Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting, Symposium 12, August 3-8. from: http://eco.confex.com/eco/2008/techprogram/P9585.HTM.

Biedenweg, K., Monroe, M. C., & Wojcik, D. J. (2013). Foundation of environmental education. North American association for environmental education, 1-115. from: https://cdn.naaee.org/sites/default/files/acrossthespectrum_8-1-16.pdf

Bruyere, Brett L. (2008). The Effects of Environmental Education on Ecological Literacy of First-Year College Students. 37, 20-26. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ788505.

Bruyere B., & Rapp S. (2007). Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 503–516.Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560701402034.

Caddafie, S. U., Martuti, N. K. T., & Rudyatmi, C. (2017). The impact of Adiwiyata program on environmental caring character. Journal of biology education, 6 (3), 350-356. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/article/view/21090.

Chopra, R. (2016). Environmental degradation in india: causes and consequences. International journal of applied environmental sciences, 11(6), 1593-1601. Retrieved from https://www.ripublication.com/ijaes16/ijaesv11n6_21.pdf

Damerell, P., Howe, C., Millner-Gulland, E. J. (2013). Child-orientated environmental education influences adult knowledge and household behavior. Environmental Research Letters, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015016.

Davidson, M. F. (2010). Ecological Literacy Evaluation Of The University Of Iceland Faculty, Staff, And Students; Implications For A University Sustainability Policy, University of Iceland, Iceland. from: https://skemman.is/handle/1946/5524?locale=en.

Desfandi, M., Maryani, E., & Disman. Building ecoliteracy through adiwiyata program (study at adiwiyata school in Banda Aceh). Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(1), 51–56. from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/ijg.11230.

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup & Kehutanan Provinsi Banten. (2017). Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (SLHD) Provinsi Banten. Banten: Pemerintah Provinsi Banten. Retrieved from: https://dlhk.bantenprov.go.id/read/article/408/Buku-Status-Lingkungan-Hidup-Daerah-SLHD-Provinsi-Banten-Tahun-2017.html

Erharbor, N. I., & Don, J. U. (2016). Impact of environmental education on the knowledge and attitude of students towards the environment. International journal of environmental & science education, 11(12), 5367-5375. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115646.pdf.

Gutti, B., Aji, M. M., & Magaji, B. (2012). Environmental impact of natural resources exploitation in nigeria and the way forward. Journal of Applied Technology in Environmental Sanitation, 2 (2): 95-102. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/47301803-Environmental-impact-of-natural-resources-exploitation-in-nigeria-and-the-way-forward.html

Istiana, R., & Awaludin, M. T. (2018). Enhancing biology education student’s ability to solve problems in environmental science material through inquiri model-based lesson study. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 57-66. from https://doi.org/10.21009/ biosferjpb.11-1.6.

Iswari, R. D, & Utomo, S. W. (2017). Evaluasi penerapan program adiwiyata untuk membentuk perilaku peduli lingkungan di kalangan siswa (kasus: SMAN 9 Tangerang Selatan dan MA Negeri 1 Serpong). Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 15(1), 35-41. doi:10.14710/jil.15.1.35-41.

Jordan, R. C., Singer, F., Vaughan, J., & Berkowitz, A. (2008). What should every citizen know about ecology. Front Ecol Environ, 7, 495–500. doi:10.1890/070113.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (2010). Wujudkan Sekolah Peduli Dan Berbudaya Lingkungan. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup.

Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L., R., Kollman, J., Overbenck, G. E., & Prado, I. P. (2014). Ecological literacy and beyond: problem-based learning for future professionals, AMBIO, 44, 154–162. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2.

Lestari, P., Ristanto, R. H., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Metacognitive and conceptual understanding of pteridophytes: Development and validity testing of an integrated assessment tool. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 2(1), 15-24.

Loganayaki, B. (2014). Creating environmental awareness for tribal school children. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2 (3), 174 176. Retrieved from https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/ recent_issues_pdf/2014/February/February_2014_1391506833_0c336_56.pdf

Martin P. (2008). Teacher qualification guidelines, ecological literacy and outdoor education. Aust Journal of Outdoor Education. 12, 32–38. Retrieved from https://www.latrobe.edu.au/education/downloads/martin_p_Ecologicla-literacy-andOE.pdf

Maryono. (2015). The implementation of the environmental education at “adiwiyata” schools in pacitan regency (an analysis of the implementation of grindle model policy). Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 31-42. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ba9/10bcf6b9003e57421844dcb98bb842a6a2e0.pdf

Mcginn, A. E. (2014). Quantifying and Understanding Ecological Literacy: A Study of First Year Students at Liberal Arts Institutions, Dickinson College. from http://scholar.dickinson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=student_honors

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Portoles, J. J. S., & Lopez, V. S. (2008). Types of knowledge and their relations to problem solving in science: directions for practice, Education Science Journal, 6, 105-112.

Pitman, S., D., Sutton, P., & Daniels, C. (2016). Ecological Literacy and Socio Demographics: Who Are The Most Eco-Literate in Our Community, and Why. International Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2016.1263689.

Pitman, S. D., Sutton, P., & Daniels, C. (2017). Ecological Literacy and Psychographics: Lifestyle Contributors to Ecological Knowledge and Understanding. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1333047.

Pitman S. D., & Daniels C. B. (2016). Quantifying ecological literacy in an adult western community: the development and application of a new assessment tool and community standard. Plos One. 11, e0150648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150648.

Rachman, S. P. D., & Maryani, E. (2017). Teachers’ and students’ green behaviour of Adiwiyata targeted school. 1st UPI International Geography Seminar. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012042.

Riduwan. (2009). Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru-Karyawan Dan Peneliti Muda. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ristanto, R. H. (2011). Pembelajaran biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dengan multimedia dan lingkungan rill terhadap prestasi belajar. Jurnal Educatio, 6(1), 53-68.

Ristanto, R. H. (2010). Pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dengan multimedia dan lingkungan rill ditinjau dari motivasi berprestasi dan kemampuan awal. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

Saito, C. H. (2013). Environmental education and biodiversity concern: beyond the ecological literacy. American Journal of Agricutural and Biological Science, 8(1), 12-27. from doi:10.3844/ajabssp.2013.12.27.

Sartono, N., Rusdi, R., & Handayani, R. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) dan discovery learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analisis siswa sman 27 jakarta pada materi sistem imun. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 58-64.

Sigit, D. V., Ernawati, & Qibtiah, M. (2017). Hubungan pengetahuan lingkungan hidup dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah pencemaran lingkungan pada siswa SMAN 6 Tangerang. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 1-6.

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Scholz RW. (2011). Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/5/863/pdf

Yildirim, F. & Hablemitoglu, S. (2013). Ecological Literacy for A Sustainable Future: Proposal of an Eco-Sociological Model. Rural Environment, 46-50. Retrieved from: http://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=LV2013000301.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v11i1.31593