Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

1. Sociology Education
2. Humanities Education
3. General sociology
4. Culture
5. Urban village community
6. Character education
7. Education and Learning
8. PTK in the field of sociology



Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Book Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issues

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

In this sociology and humanities education journal, research articles sent to this online journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) reviewers. Accepted research articles will be available online after the journal peer review process. The language used in this journal is English or Indonesian.

Peer reviews are designed to assess the validity, quality, and often originality of articles for publication. The ultimate goal is to maintain the integrity of knowledge by filtering out invalid or bad quality articles.


Publication Frequency

Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora is a Journal published online twice a year, April and October


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethic

Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora is published twice a year, every April and October. ideas and research written by experts, educators, scientists, practitioners, sociologists, humanists and reviewers in the discipline / study of Education.

The ethics statement of the scientific publication code is based on LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning the Ethics of the Scientific Publication Code, which upholds 3 ethnic values in publications, namely: (i) neutrality, clear from conflicts of interest in the processing of publications; (ii) fairness, giving the author the right to claim the paper; and (iii) Honesty, clearly from duplication, fabrication, forgery, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Duties and Responsibilities of journal processors

1. Determine the journal title, scope of study, period, and accreditation if necessary.

2. Arranging editorial committee membership.

3. Determine the relationship between the publisher, editor, expert and other participants in the agreement.

4. Appreciate confidential matters, both for researchers, writers / editors, editors, and experts who are donated.

5. Apply norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.

6.Study journal policies and send them to authors. Make a code of ethics guide for editors and experts.

7. Regular journal publishing.

8. Provides guaranteed availability of funding sources for the continuity of journal publications.

9. Network and marketing settings.

10. Prepare licenses and other legal matters.

Duties and Responsibilities of editors

  1. Meeting the readers and authors/writers requirements.
  2.  Attempting to the increasing of publication quality continuously.
  3.  Applying the process to assuring the quality of published papers/articles.
  4. Promoting freedom of ideas objectively.
  5. Maintaining the integrity of academic track record of the authors/writers.
  6.  Submitting corrections, clarifications, returning, apologizing if necessary.
  7. Responsible for the style and form the writing, whilst the content and any statements written in the writing is the responsibility of the writers/authors.
  8. Actively asking the writer/authors, readers, experts, and the editors' committee about their opinion and suggestion to increase the publication quality.
  9. Promoting the assessment to the journal for each finding.
  10. Supporting the ideas to decrease the research and publication errors by having the authors/writers to enclose their Ethic Clearance forms that have been approved by the Ethic Clearance Commission.
  11. Participating ideas to educate the researchers about publication ethics.
  12. Studying the effects of publication policies on the writers/authors and experts and fixing it in order to increase the responsibilities and minimize the errors.
  13. Having open-minded attitude toward the new or others ideas which possibly oppose personal view. 
  14. Do not force on his/her own view, authors/writers or third parties view that can cause in giving subjective decision.
  15. Motivate the authors/writers in order to do constructive improvement to have the proper publications.

Duties and responsibilities of experts

  1. Commanding duties from the editors committee to review the papers and deliver the results to the editors to determine a proper published paper.
  2. The reviewers cannot review a paper which involves him/her self directly or indirectly.
  3. Keeping the privacy of the authors to not publish the corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by giving critics, suggestions, and recommendations.
  4. Encourage the authors/writers to do improvement to their papers.
  5. Review again the papers that have been reviewed based on the standards.
  6. The papers are reviewed in time based on the scientific standard form determined (Data collection method, the authorization of the author, conclusion, etc).

Duties and Responsibilities of the authors/writers

  1. Ensure that the author who registers has met the requirements as an author.
  2. Collectively responsible for his profession and the content of the article including the method, analysis, calculation/measurement, and details.
  3. State the sources (including fund) directly or indirectly.
  4. Explain the limits in his/her writing.
  5. Give response to the correction given by the expert professionally and on time.
  6. Inform to the editor if she/he wants to cancel his/her participation.
  7. Make a statement letter stated that the paper is genuine, never published in other publishers and in any other languages, and not in process of proposing to the other publishers.



All work in the manuscript should be free of any plagiarism, falsification, fabrications, or omission of significant material.

Authors are expected to explicitly cite others' work and ideas, even if the work or ideas are not quoted verbatim or paraphrased. This standard applies whether the previous work is published, unpublished, or electronically available. Failure to properly cite the work of others may constitute plagiarism. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Before Article is accepted, article will check with http://www.ithenticate.com



Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora indexing by: