Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (JPPKN) merupakan jurnal peer-review bidang Sosial dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal ini diterbitkan dua kali setahun oleh Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Pancasila Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia. Semua makalah akan ditinjau dua kali lipat. Makalah yang diterima akan tersedia online (akses gratis) dan versi cetak.

Jurnal ini menerbitkan karya tulis asli bidang Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Pembelajaran yang mencakup namun tidak terbatas pada ruang lingkup:
Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, Kajian Pancasila, Pembelajaran Masalah PPKn, Pendidikan Karakter, Ilmu Sosial Politik dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Pendidikan Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan. .

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Book Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Essay

Editors
  • Thomy Sastra Atmaja
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by double-blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 3 (three) weeks. The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process.

 

Publication Frequency

Published twice a year, in April and October

 

Open Access Policy

JPPKN ( Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan ) This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

Jurnal ini menggunakan sistem LOCKSS untuk menciptakan sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi di antara perpustakaan yang berpartisipasi dan memungkinkan perpustakaan tersebut membuat arsip permanen jurnal untuk tujuan pelestarian dan restorasi. Lagi...

 

Publication Ethic

This is the statement of ethics for Jurnal Pendidikan PKn

This statement was adapted from the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and covered the code of ethics for chief editor, editorial board members, reviewers, and authors. This statement based on:

https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Guidelines

Articles published in Jurnal Pendidikan PKn are an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge on civic education, and those are a direct reflection of the writer's and institutions' quality. It is, therefore, essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher, and the society.  Editors are committed to guaranteeing that all procedures directed merely to facilitate an objective and intellectual treatment. Further, the editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or particular political and group interest. Software used to avoid plagiarism among the articles.

Duties of Editors

  1. Publication Decisions: 

The editor boards journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

  1. Fair Play: 

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

  1. Confidentiality: 

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

  1. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by anyone who has a view of the paper (while handling it) in his or her research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or idea obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests revealed after publication.

  1. Review of Manuscripts:

The editor must ensure that the editor for originality initially evaluates each manuscript. The editor should organize and use peer review justly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

 

Duties of Reviewers

A reviewer should review and send the review comments in due period. If the article is not in your area of interest, then revert to the editor so that the other reviewers can be approached.

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

  1. Promptness: 

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the assigned manuscript or unable to provide a prompt review should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process

  1. Confidentiality: 

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  1. Standards of Objectivity: 

Reviews should be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments

  1. Acknowledgment of Sources: 

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. The proper citation should accompany any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  1. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for particular advantage. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standard: 

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

  1. Data Access and Retention: 

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  1. Originality and Plagiarism: 

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this must appropriately be cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism, in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

  1. Multiple Publication: 

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

  1. Acknowledgment of Sources: 

Pengakuan yang pantas atas karya orang lain harus selalu diberikan. Penulis harus mengutip publikasi yang berpengaruh dalam menentukan sifat karya yang dilaporkan. Informasi yang diperoleh secara pribadi, seperti dalam percakapan, korespondensi, atau diskusi dengan pihak ketiga, tidak boleh digunakan atau dilaporkan tanpa izin tertulis dan jelas dari sumbernya. Informasi yang diperoleh selama layanan rahasia, seperti naskah wasit atau permohonan hibah, tidak boleh digunakan tanpa izin tertulis yang jelas dari penulis karya yang terlibat dalam layanan ini.

  1. Penulisan Makalah: 

Penulisan harus dibatasi pada mereka yang telah memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap konsepsi, desain, pelaksanaan, atau interpretasi penelitian yang dilaporkan. Semua pihak yang telah memberikan kontribusi signifikan harus dicantumkan sebagai rekan penulis. Apabila orang lain telah berpartisipasi dalam aspek substantif tertentu dari proyek penelitian, mereka harus diakui atau dicantumkan sebagai kontributor. Penulis koresponden harus memastikan bahwa semua rekan penulis yang sesuai dan tidak ada rekan penulis yang tidak tepat disertakan dalam makalah dan bahwa semua rekan penulis telah melihat dan menyetujui versi akhir makalah serta menyetujui penyerahannya untuk dipublikasikan.

  1. Bahaya dan Subyek Manusia atau Hewan: 

Jika karya tersebut melibatkan bahan kimia, prosedur, atau peralatan yang memiliki bahaya yang tidak biasa dalam penggunaannya, penulis harus mengidentifikasinya dalam naskah.

  1. Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan: 

Semua penulis harus mengungkapkan dalam naskahnya segala konflik kepentingan finansial atau konflik kepentingan substantif lainnya yang mungkin ditafsirkan mempengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi naskah mereka. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk proyek tersebut harus diungkapkan.

  1. Kesalahan mendasar dalam karya yang diterbitkan: 

Ketika seorang penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidakakuratan yang signifikan dalam karyanya yang diterbitkan, penulis harus segera memberi tahu editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk mencabut atau memperbaiki makalah tersebut. Jika editor atau penerbit mengetahui dari pihak ketiga bahwa suatu karya yang diterbitkan mengandung kesalahan yang signifikan, penulis harus segera mencabut atau mengoreksi makalah atau memberikan bukti kepada editor tentang kebenaran artikel aslinya.

 

 

Retraction

Papers published in the Civics Education Journal will be considered withdrawn for publication if:

They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either due to error (e.g. falsification of data) or honest error (e.g. calculation error or experimental error)
the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (i.e. a case of over-publication)
that is plagiarism
it reports unethical research
The retraction mechanism follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf .

 

Screening of Plagiarism

Papers submitted to the Civics Education Journal will be screened for plagiarism using the TURNITIN plagiarism detection tool. Plagiarism scanning on manuscripts will be carried out using Turnitin software. The Civics Education Journal will immediately reject papers that lead to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before sending articles to reviewers, they are first checked by a member of the editorial team with a similarity/plagiarism tool. Papers submitted to the Civics Education Journal must have a similarity level of less than 20%, and if more then they are rejected.

Plagiarism presents another person's thoughts or words as if they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or by failing to properly cite the source. Plagiarism can take many forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing someone else's work. To properly assess whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:

An author may copy another author's work by copying it word for word, in whole or in part, without permission, knowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified by comparing the original source with the manuscript/work suspected of plagiarism.
Substantial copying implies that an author can reproduce large portions of another author without permission, acknowledgment, or citation. The term substantial can be understood in terms of both quality and quantity, which is often used in intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words, or phrases from a source and arranging them into new sentences in writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not cite properly or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is a form that is more difficult to identify.