PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA MODEL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA RANAH KOGNITIF DAN SIKAP KERJA SAMA PESERTA DIDIK SMA

Nanda Annisa Solikhah, Sukardiyono Sukardiyono

Abstract


This research aims to: (1) produce physics learning tools using the think talk write type cooperative learning model which are suitable for use to improve learning outcomes in the cognitive domain and cooperative attitudes of students and (2) determine the effectiveness of learning tools using the think talk write type cooperative learning model in improve cognitive learning outcomes and cooperative attitudes of students. This research is development research (R&D) with a 4D model consisting of stages (1) define, (2) design, (3) develop, and (4) disseminate. The products developed are RPPs, LKPD, test question instruments, and cooperative attitude assessment questionnaires. The subjects in this research were students of SMA Negeri 1 Gamping class XI MIPA 1 as the experimental class and XI MIPA 2 as the control class. The results of the research show that: (1) the learning tools developed are suitable for use in physics learning with a very good category, (2) the learning tools developed are effectively used to improve learning outcomes in the cognitive domain of physics and the cooperative attitude of class XI high school students with effect scores. The size of the learning outcomes in the cognitive domain is 2.02, which is included in the very large category, and the effect size value for cooperative attitudes is 0.80, which is included in the medium category.


Keywords


Learning Tools, Think Talk Write, Cognitive Learning Outcomes, Collaboration

References


Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Bagaskara, R. F. (2020). Analisis Dampak Covid- 19 pada Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA Negeri Kota Tangerang Selatan. UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA.

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics Education Research for 21st Century Learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. McMillan Publishing Company.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Daun, N. S., Helmi, H., & Haris, A. (2019). Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik di SMA Negeri 1 Bontomaranmu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika PPs UNM, 2, 37–40.

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of Learning Module with Setting Contextual Teaching and Learning to Increase the Understanding of Concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26

Guido, R. M. D. (2013). Attitude and Motivation towards Learning Physics. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(11), 2087–2094. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV2IS110659

Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Book.

Hetiningsih, M., Sunarno, W., & Surantoro, S. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TTW untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kerjasama Siswa Kelas X SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar. JMPF : Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v7i2.31466

Istiyono, E. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern (1st ed.). UNY Press.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Parama Publishing.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Nabillah, T., & Abadi, A. P. (2019). Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Hasil Belajar. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1c), 659–663. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/sesiomadika/article/view/2685

Naimnule, L., Oetpah, V., & Sila, V. U. R. (2016). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write (TTW) di SMUK. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(10), 2050–2053.

Neizhela, A., & Mosik. (2015). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual dengan Metode Think Pair Share Materi Kalor pada Siswa SMP. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 36–42.

Pee, B., Woodman, T., Fry, H., & Davenport, E. S. (2002). Appraising and assessing reflection in students’ writing on a structured worksheet. Medical Education, 36(6), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01227.x

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Alfabeta.

Suparya, I. K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write (TTW) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran IPA Di Sekolah Dasar. WIDYACARYA, 2(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.55115/widyacarya.v2i2.95

Suyanto, & Gio, P. U. (2017). Statistika Nonparametrik dengan SPSS, Minitab, dan R. USU Press.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Indiana University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v5i1.78422

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed By: 

        

Published By:

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Keguruan & Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Tanjungpura,
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia

website:http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JIPPF/index
email :jippf@untan.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.