ANALISIS TINGKAT BERPIKIR DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL GERAK PARABOLA MENGGUNAKAN TAKSONOMI STRUCTURE OF THE OBSERVED LEARNING OUTCOMES (SOLO) SISWA KELAS X MIA SMAN 1 SUNGAI RAYA

Desi Hartanti, Tomo Djudin, Syukran Mursyid

Abstract


This This study aims to describe the level of students’ thinking profilein solving parabolic motion problems based on the SOLO taxonomy seen from learning outcomes and gender. This is a survey research without a comparison group. Data collection was done by giving 4 questions to 95class X MIA students at SMAN 1 Sungai Raya, and categorized based on learning outcomes (high, medium, low) and gender (male, female). The level ofstudents’ thinking profile in solving parabolic motion problems based on SOLO taxonomyis 50.52% at the pre-structural level, 11.57% at the uni-structural level, 21.05% at the multi-structural level, 16.84% at relational level , and0% at extended-abstract level. Additionally, students with high learning outcomes reached the uni-structural-relational thinking level, while moderate ones reached the uni-structural-multi-structural level, and low ones reached the uni-structural-pre-structural level. In terms of gender,female students' average percentage of thinking level is 44.2% higher than male students with only 33.6% of the ideal score.

Keywords: Thinking Level, SOLO Taxonomy, Parabolic Motion.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan. dkk. (1996). Brain Development, Gender and IQ children : A Volumetric Imaging Study. Oxford University. Brain (1996), 119, 1763-1774.

Annisa Rahman. (2014). Ketidakmampuan Pemecahan Soal Hukum Archimedes Berdasarkan Taksonomi Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vol. 3, No 7.

Azizah (2012). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO. (Online). (http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/968/4/083611020_Bab2.pdf, diakses pada 2 Oktober 2018).

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. (Online). (http://store.free-college.org/noleech1.php?hidden=q:/386000/45cc90a412ef1783ee6d3e10cbaecb59&hidden0=John+Biggs,+Catherine+Tang+Teaching+for+Quality+Learning+at+University+++2007.pdf, diakses pada 2 Oktober 2018).

Braband, C. dan Dahl, B. (2009). Using the SOLO taxonomy to analyze competence progression of university science curricula. Journal Higher Education, Vol 58, No.4: 531-549. (http://www.itu.dk/~brabrand/progression.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

C.D. Wright, dkk. (2016). Cognitive Difficulty and Format Gender and Sosioeconomic Gaps in Exam Performance of Student in Introdutory Biology Courses. CBE – life science education Vol.15, 1-16, summer 2016.

Dharma, Kusuma Kelana (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Keperawatan : Panduan Melaksanakan dan Menerapkan Hasil Penelitian. Jakarta: Trans InfoMedia.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.

Hyde, J. S & dan Mertz, J.E. (2009). Gender, Culture and Mathematics Performances. (Online). (http://www.pnas.org/content/106/22/8801.full.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

Indonesia PISA Centre. (2014). Level PISA. (Online). (http://www.indonesiapisacenter.com /2013/08/level-pisa.html, diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

Iswadi, Hazrul. (2016). Sekelumit Dari Hasil PISA 2015 Yang Baru Dirilis. (Online). (http://www.ubaya.ac.id/2014/content/articles_detail/230/Overview-of-the-PISA-2015-results-that-have-just-been-Released.html, diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

Madsen, McKagan, Sarah B., & Sayre, Eleanor C. (2013). Gender Gap on Concept Inventories in Physics: What is Consistent, and What Factors Influence Gap. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research 9,020121.

O’Neill, G. & Murphy, F. (2010). UCD Teaching and Learning/Resources, Guide to Taxonomy of Learning. (http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtla0034.pdf, diunduh pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ormord, Jeanne Ellis. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Potter, M.K &Kustra, E. (2012). Primer on Learning Outcomes and SOLO Taxonomy. (http://www.uwindsor.ca/ctl/system/files/PRIMER-on-Learning-Outcomes.pdf, diunduh pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2018).

Putri, H. U, dkk. (2017). How to Analyze the Students’ Thinking Levels Based on SOLO Taxonomy?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Redhana, W.I. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia Vol 13, No 1 : 2239-2253.

Santrock, John W. (2007). Remaja Edisi II Jilid I; (Penerjemah: Benedictine Widyasinta). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sucipto, (2017). Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dengan Menggunakan Strategi Metakognitif Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Vol. 2, No 1: 64 – 65.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zhu, Zheng. (2007). Gender Differences in Mathematical Problem Solving Patterns: A riview of literature. International Education Journal, 2007, 8(2), 187-203.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v2i1.44591

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed By:

                   

Editorial Office/Publisher Address:
Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Keguruan & Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Tanjungpura,
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia

website:http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JIPPF/index
email :[email protected]

Published By:

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika
Universitas Tanjungpura