Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

JILIN merupakan jurnal enam bulanan yang memuat artikel Bahasa Mandarin baik dari dalam maupun luar negeri. Ruang lingkup dari JILIN berupa hasil penelitian maupun konseptual yang berhubungan dengan linguistik, budaya, dialek dan pengajaran Bahasa mandarin. Jurnal ini terbit secara berkala setahun dua kali, yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember.

《吉麟国际汉语语言期刊》是报道国内外有关汉语教育与研究的学术刊物。本期刊主要栏目有：语言学研究；中国文化研究；汉语方言研究和汉语教学研究等。每年六月和十二月出版，半年期刊。

JILIN is a six-monthly journal  (published for every six month in one year) that consists of articles in Chinese both from within the country and abroad. The scope of JILIN is in the form of research and conceptual results related to linguistics, culture, dialects and teaching Mandarin.  This journal is published in June and December every year.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. Language used in this journal is Mandarin

Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.

From a publisher’s perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands.

Running articles through the process of peer review adds value to them. For this reason publishers need to make sure that peer review is robust.

Editor Feedback

"Pointing out the specifics about flaws in the paper’s structure is paramount. Are methods valid, is data clearly presented, and are conclusions supported by data?” (Editor feedback)

“If an editor can read your comments and understand clearly the basis for your recommendation, then you have written a helpful review.” (Editor feedback)

Peer Review at Its Best

What peer review does best is improve the quality of published papers by motivating authors to submit good quality work – and helping to improve that work through the peer review process.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Author Fee

This journal charges the following author fees.

Submission and publication in JILIN are free of charge

 

Publication Ethics

JILIN is a journal that consists of articles in Chinese both from within the country and abroad. The scope of JILIN is in the form of research and conceptual results related to linguistics, culture, dialects and teaching Mandarin.

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the process of publishing scientific journals, managers, editors, best partners, and authors/ writers. This statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head of LIPI Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication essentially upholds three ethical values in publication, namely (i) Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications, (ii) Justice, giving authorship rights to those entitled as authors / authors, and (iii) Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Journal Managers

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine the editorial board membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties in a contract.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors/ writers, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a review of journal policies and submit them to authors/ writers, board editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Guarantee the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

 

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. Meeting the needs of readers and authors/ writers,
  2. Strive for continuous improvement in the quality of publications,
  3. Implement the process to guarantee the quality of published papers,
  4. Prioritizing freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. Maintain the integrity of the academic track record of the author,
  6. Submitting corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  7. Responsible for the style and format of the writing, while the content and all statements in the paper are the responsibility of the author/ writer,
  8. Actively asking for the opinions of authors, readers, bestari partners, and members of the editorial board to improve the quality of publications,
  9. Encourage the assessment of journals if there are findings,
  10. Support initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by asking authors to attach an Ethics Clearance form that has been approved by the Ethics Clearance Commission,
  11. Support initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  12. Assess the effects of policy issues on the attitudes of authors / authors and best partners and improve them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
  13. Having an open mind about new opinions or other people's views that might conflict with personal opinions,
  14. Does not maintain one's own opinion, the author or third party that can lead to non-objective decisions,
  15. Encourage authors/ writers, so they can make repairs to their writings until they are published.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Bestari Partners

  1. Obtain the task of the editor to review the paper and submit the results of the review to the editor, as material for determining the feasibility of a paper to be published.
  2. The reviewer may not conduct a study of a paper involving him, directly or indirectly
  3. Maintain the privacy of authors by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by giving criticism, suggestions, input, and recommendations
  4. Encourage the author/ writer to make improvements to the paper
  5. Reviewing the corrected paper in accordance with predetermined standards.
  6. Writing is reviewed in a timely manner according to the style of the issue published based on scientific rules (methods of data collection, legality of the author, conclusions, etc.).

 

Duties and Responsibilities of the Author

  1. Ensure that what is included in the list of authors meets the criteria as an author/ writer.
  2. Collectively responsible for work and the contents of the article include methods, analysis, calculations, and details.
  3. State the origin of resources (including funding), both directly and indirectly.
  4. Explain the limitations in research
  5. Responding to comments made by best partners in a professional and timely manner.
  6. Inform the editor if you will retract the paper.
  7. Using 80 percent of journals as a reference in writing articles, and reference journals 50 percent of the last 5 years published.
  8. Make a statement that the paper submitted for publication is authentic, has not been published anywhere in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.

After finishing reading this Scientific Publication Ethics, please download the Statement of Ethics. Please sign and submit the Ethics Statement as part of your initial article submission. The Ethics Statement can be sent by post, email or fax.

 

Plagiarism and Retraction Policy

Plagiarsn Policy

Journal Internasional Lingua Mandarin (JILIN) Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in JILIN. Journal Internasional Lingua Mandarin (JILIN) will use iThenticate's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 20% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 20% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.
 
Article Withdrawal
Only used for Articles in Press which represent early versions of articles and sometimes contain errors, or may have been accidentally submitted twice. Occasionally, but less frequently, the articles may represent infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like. Articles in Press (articles that have been accepted for publication but which have not been formally published and will not yet have the complete volume/issue/page information) that include errors, or are discovered to be accidental duplicates of other published article(s), or are determined to violate our journal publishing ethics guidelines in the view of the editors (such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like). Withdrawn means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is removed and replaced with a HTML page and PDF simply stating that the article has been withdrawn according to the Elsevier Policy on Article in Press Withdrawal with a link to the current policy document.
 
Article Retraction
Infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like. Occasionally a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication.The retraction of an article by its authors or the editor under the advice of members of the scholarly community has long been an occasional feature of the learned world. Standards for dealing with retractions have been developed by a number of library and scholarly bodies, and this best practice is adopted for article retraction by Journal Internasional Lingua Mandarin (JILIN):
  • A retraction note titled “Retraction: [article title]” signed by the authors and/or the editor is published in the paginated part of a subsequent issue of the journal and listed in the contents list.
  • In the electronic version, a link is made to the original article.
  • The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. It is to this screen that the link resolves; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.
  • The original article is retained unchanged save for a watermark on the .pdf indicating on each page that it is “retracted.”
  • The HTML version of the document is removed.
 
Article Removal: legal limitations
In an extremely limited number of cases, it may be necessary to remove an article from the online database. This will only occur where the article is clearly defamatory, or infringes others’ legal rights, or where the article is, or we have good reason to expect it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article, if acted upon, might pose a serious health risk. In these circumstances, while the metadata (Title and Authors) will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating the article has been removed for legal reasons