Thematic analysis on novice learner’s procedural writing challenges: Insights, influences, and implications
Abstract
This research article provides an examination of the challenges faced by students during the composition of procedure texts. It aims to uncover factors influencing students' proficiency. Utilizing thematic analysis, we analyzed students' written texts and conducted interviews with junior high school English teachers and students, providing a holistic perspective. Four significant areas of difficulty were identified: minimal word and phrase variations, lack of clarity and precision, ignorance of writing mechanisms, and challenges with grammar and spelling. These challenges provided insights into the recurring patterns of students’ writing. Factors contributing to these difficulties included motivational factors, language environment, language proficiency, and formal presentation aspects. Student motivation to write and seek comments was hindered by low intrinsic motivation. Students' writing talents were also shaped by language exposure and proficiency, which varied by background and experience. Additionally, formal presentation characteristics and technology-based teaching strategy restrictions underlined the need for improved infrastructure to accommodate various and engaging teaching methods. In conclusion, the research sheds light on the intricate landscape of students' struggles in composing texts and underscores the urgency of providing tailored teaching strategies to address these challenges effectively while also keeping the influencing factors in consideration.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, S. (2022). Learner strategies in foreign language learning and instructional implementation in the context of teaching young learners. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(4), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v2i4.53
Aghajani, M., & Adloo, M. (2018). The effect of online cooperative learning on students’ writing skills and attitudes through Telegram application. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11330a
Alhajaji, B. H., Algmadi, J. S., & Metwally, A. A. (2020). Exploring the success of GMT technique: Games, mind-mapping, and Twitter hashtags in teaching vocabulary in EFL higher education environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p290
Alharthi, S. (2021). From instructed writing to free-writing: A study of EFL learners. SAGE Open, 11(1), 21582440211007110. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007112
Alharthi, T. (2020). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and FL speaking performance. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n1p37
Al-Shboul, O. K., Rababah, L. M., Banikalef, A. A., & Mehawesh, M. I. (2023). Role of learner autonomy in intrinsic motivation in EFL writing. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i2.4756
Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 665. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000089
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu059
Carson, L. (2017). Second language use as a threshold concept: Reconceptualising language learning journeys. International Journal of Education, 9(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v9i2.11315
Castillo-Cuesta, L. (2020). Using digital games for enhancing EFL grammar and vocabulary in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(20), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.16159
Castillo-Cuesta, L. (2022). Using Genially games for enhancing EFL reading and writing skills in online education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.19
Damanik, J. Y. (2022). Peer feedback to improve Indonesian adult learners’ writing skills: A literature review. Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3253
Fadillah, A. C. (2020). Pronunciation difficulties of EFL learners in Indonesia: A literature study. Jurnal Budaya Brawijaya, 2(1), 7–13. https://jurnalbudaya.ub.ac.id/index.php/jbb/article/view/13
Fauzan, U., Aulya, S. F., & Noor, W. N. (2020). Writing error analysis in exposition text of the EFL junior high school students. UIN Satu Repository. http://repository.uinsi.ac.id/handle/123456789/2845
Fitria, T. N. (2021). 'Grammarly' as a teacher’s alternative in evaluating non-EFL students' writings. LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v6i2.3957
Galway, G. J., Maddigan, B., & Stordy, M. (2020). Teacher educator experiences of iPad integration in pre-service teacher education: Successes and challenges. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(5), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1819397
Ghufron, M. A. (2019). Exploring an automated feedback program 'Grammarly' and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment. In Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia. EAI. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285308
Hardianti, Y., & Sudarsono, S. (2021). English varieties in the Year-7 coursebook taught in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 3(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v3i1.39096
Hentasmaka, D., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). Peer feedback uptakes and outcomes across EFL students’ proficiency levels: A study at tertiary education in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14316a
Hidayah, J., & Morganna, R. (2019). Fulfilling the needs of diverse students: Teaching strategies for EFL inclusive classrooms. SUAR BETANG, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v14i2.135
Irmalia, M. (2016). Indonesian interference in students’ writing. English Education Journal, 7(4), 496–508. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/5535/4569
Juliaty, H. (2019). Exploring academic identities of EFL novice writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20230
Kadmiry, M. (2021). The comparison between the process-oriented approach and the product-oriented approach in teaching writing: The case of Moroccan EFL students in preparatory classes for the grandes écoles. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826539
Karakoç, D., & Köse, G. D. (2017). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading, writing and proficiency scores of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 352–378. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/36109/405467
Kassab, S. E., Hassan, N., El-Araby, S., Salem, A. H., Alrebish, S. A., Al-Amro, A. S., Al-Shobaili, H. A., & Hamdy, H. (2017). Development and validation of the motivation for tutoring questionnaire in problem-based learning programs. Health Professions Education, 3(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.03.001
Kiliç, M. (2019). Vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of performance in writing and speaking: A case of Turkish EFL learners. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 57, 133–164. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1224421
Linarsih, A., Irwan, D., & Putra, M. I. R. (2020). The interferences of Indonesian grammatical aspects into English: An evaluation on preservice English teachers’ EFL learning. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.565
Mayer, R. E. (2022). Instructional media and instructional methods in digital language learning: Are we asking the right questions? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 396–397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000559
Muhassin, M., Hidayah, R., Hidayati, D. A., & Pradana, S. A. (2020). Investigating spelling errors among Indonesian EFL secondary school students. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 13(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v13i2.7699
Nilforoushan, S., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, G.-R. (2023). Exploring the perceived and real metacognitive reading strategies of Iranian EFL learners: Different text types in focus. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231164570. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231164567
Nurweni, A., & Komariah, E. (2023). Word number, level, and frequency in current English course books: Corpus study. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 5(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v1i1.64468
Nuryati, N., Hufad, A., & Rusdiyani, I. (2024). Improving language acquisition: Effective numeracy literacy strategies in early childhood. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(2), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i2.84
Phuket, P. R. N., & Othman, N. B. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99–106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083531
Putu, A. A., Seri, N. L. N., & Suparwa, I. N. (2015). Adaptasi kosakata bahasa Bali dalam bahasa Melayu Loloan Bali. LITERA, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v14i1.4404
Rahmawati, D. (2020). Modul pembelajaran SMA bahasa Inggris. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/22072/
Rahmiani, N., Binmudnee, P., & Ojurongbe, S. A. (2022). Post-pandemic social cohesiveness in English language learning: Actors’ capacity transformation. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 4(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v4i2.57786
Ratnaningsih, S., & Azizah, A. (2019). Error analysis in the descriptive text writing of vocational high school students. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1364
Rifaldi, A., Qureshi, B., & Rosnija, E. (2022). Designing irregular verb game as teaching tool for learning irregular verbs. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 4(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v4i1.51823
Ristati, R., Norahmi, M., & Amalia, N. (2022). Effect of implementing problem-based learning (PBL) on learning procedural text and critical thinking in Grade VIII SMP Nusantara Palangka Raya. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v23i2.5221
Salam, U., Sri Rezeki, Y., Riyanti, D., & Suthathothon, P. (2023). Teachers’ challenges and strategies in using digital media in teaching English. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 5(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v1i1.63204
Salwa, S. (2015). Considerable strategies of teaching large multi-level classes: A narrative study of what EFL teachers should do. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 1(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v1i1.1197
Sari, H. M., Sutapa, Y. G., & Sada, C. (2021). Clustering technique to improve ability of generating ideas in recount text writing. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v3i1.38880
Sermsook, K., Liamnimit, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). An analysis of errors in written English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p101
Singh, C. K. S., Singh, A. K. J., Razak, N. Q. A., & Ravinthar, T. (2017). Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p16
Thi, N. K., Nikolov, M., & Simon, K. (2023). Higher-proficiency students’ engagement with and uptake of teacher and Grammarly feedback in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2122476
Toba, R., Noor, W. N., & others. (2019). The current issues of Indonesian EFL students’ writing skills: Ability, problem, and reason in writing comparison and contrast essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Wu, S., & Alrabah, S. (2020). Harnessing text structure strategy for reading expository and medical texts among EFL college students. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p36
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
Zain, D. S. M., & Bowles, F. A. (2021). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for higher education instructional practices in EFL/ESL contexts: A recent review of literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 282–307. http://callej.org/journal/22-1/Zain2021.pdf
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
Zhou, G. (2016). Research on tactics of English teaching to college students by modern media technology. MATEC Web of Conferences, 44, 01077. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164401077
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v6i2.68513
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors
License URL: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JELTIM/pages/view/copyright
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING INNOVATIONS AND MATERIALS (JELTIM) is published by the Language Center of Universitas Tanjungpura in collaboration the with the English Language Teaching Materials (ELTeaM) association [Download MoU]. The publication of this journal is indexed by Arjuna (Sinta-2) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nQlvEjtATotaCg4sDNdoVa5U3BV5f4Gf/view?usp=sharing Link Sinta 2 Link Sinta Kedua, Google Scholar, ROAD, Garuda, Scilit, Crossref, Research Gate, Copernicus, and Dimensions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.