Effects of augmented reality on perceived motivation for struggling readers: Mix-method analysis

Rengganis Siwi Amumpuni, Mustakim Sagita, Zaiturrahmi Zaiturrahmi

Abstract


Higher education students who struggle with reading may find some relief via the use of technology, especially new and developing forms of technology. Even though augmented reality (AR) has been used in the classroom with great success to motivate and engage children who are difficult to teach, there hasn't been a lot of research done on how augmented print may help those who have trouble reading. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of augmented reality on perceived motivation for students currently enrolled in higher education, namely their engagement with and understanding of an upgraded design theory book, as well as their perceived motivation to read. This research was conducted using the mix method approach, supported with some different methodologies. The findings reveal that increased support for academic literature enhances motivation, engagement, and confidence in understanding, impacting both struggling and proficient readers. We concluded that students, regardless of their reading level, expressed a willingness to use AR reading assistance for future books. Further research is crucial given the heightened levels of motivation and confidence. This research aligns with technological advancements, and educators can influence the development of augmented reality apps for classroom use. Future studies should focus on students with reading difficulties, exploring the optimal design of AR experiences and learning games to enhance understanding and retention of art history lectures in higher education


Keywords


augmented reality; effect; motivation; struggling readers;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, N. (2020). Extended reading: college students’ attitudes in selecting reading materials. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 2(1), 25–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v2i1.37231

Amumpuni, R. S., Hartono, R., Rukmini, D., & Haryanti, R. P. (2022). Teaching reading using zoom : students ’ perception of reading class through zoom. International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, 8(1), 1039–1043. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/ISET/article/view/1876

Bacon, A. M., & Bennett, S. (2013). Dyslexia in higher education: the decision to study art. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(1), 19-32. . https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.742748

Bakar, R. A. (2019). Digital storytelling: An influential reading comprehension and creativity tool for the 21st century literacy skills. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v1i2.34362

Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6171143

Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w

Che Dalim, C. S., Sunar, M. S., Dey, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). Using augmented reality with speech input for non-native children’s language learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1(34), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.002

Craig, Alan B. (2013). Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications Elsevier Science. Kindle Edition. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109885072

Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325998

Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1981

Farizawati, F., Sagita, M., & Amumpuni, R. S. (2022). Improving students’ reading comprehension in narrative text through students team achievement division (stad). AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5373–5382. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1288

Green, M., Lea, J. H., & McNair, C. L. (2014). Reality check: Augmented reality for school libraries. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 28. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=anon~19907d75&id=GALE|A373680330&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=984d789f

Hall, R., Greenberg, D., Laures-Gore, J., & Pae, H. K. (2014). The relationship between expressive vocabulary knowledge and reading skills for adult struggling readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(51) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01537.x

Huang, H. W., Wu, C. W., & Chen, N. S. (2012). The effectiveness of using procedural scaffoldings in a paper-plus-smartphone collaborative learning context. Computers & Education, 59(2) 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.015

Ida Puji Lestari & Mirjam Anugerahwati, 2022. The effect of scaffolded reading experience and collaborative strategic reading on sudents reading comprehension skills across different reading proficiency levels. World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, 12(5),320-320 https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v12y2022i5p320.html

Keelor, J. L., Creaghead, N., Silbert, N., & Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2020). Text-to-speech technology: Enhancing reading comprehension for students with reading difficulty. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 14(1), 19–35. www.atia.org/atob

Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Modderman, S. L., Petersen, H. M., & Pan, S. (2013). Key areas of effective adolescent literacy programs. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 161-184. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/492685

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Templeton, S., Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Johnston, F., Flanigan, K., Townsend, D. R., Helman, L. & Hayes, L. (2015). Vocabulary their way: Word study with middle and secondary students. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Words_Their_Way.html?id=9TxDnwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Venkatesh, V. (2015). Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1(9). https://doi:10.1002/9781118785317

Vyas, D. (2015). Increasing student engagement using augmented reality. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 1(2). https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/193

Wedyan, M., Falah, J., Elshaweesh, O., Alfalah, S. F. M., & Alazab, M. (2022). Augmented reality-based English language learning: importance and state of the art. Electronics, 11(17), 2692. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11172692

Yulian, R., Ruhama’, U., & Sucipto. (2022). Developing augmented reality (AR) as assisted technology in reading based on content-language integrated learning. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 23-37 https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.23626




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v5i2.60720

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 by the authors

License URL: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JELTIM/pages/view/copyright

JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING INNOVATIONS AND MATERIALS (JELTIM) is published by the Language Center of Universitas Tanjungpura in collaboration the with the English Language Teaching Materials (ELTeaM) association  [Download MoU]. The publication of this journal is indexed by Arjuna (Sinta-2) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nQlvEjtATotaCg4sDNdoVa5U3BV5f4Gf/view?usp=sharing Link Sinta 2 Link Sinta Kedua, Google Scholar, ROAD, Garuda, Scilit, Crossref, Research Gate, Copernicus, and Dimensions. 

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats