An investigation into metaphor use in learner language: the interaction of word class and L1

Yaser Hadidi, Nastaran Behshad

Abstract


This study aims at investigating the use of metaphor in learner language with a focus on interaction of word class and L1. The findings of previous studies on metaphor use in learner language point to the fact that metaphor is found in all word classes in learners’ written production, but that some word classes clearly favor metaphorical usage more than others. In similar fashion, the present investigation looked into the interaction between metaphor, word class, and L1, although within a single register and text type, i.e. argumentative essays produced by 20 novice writers. The model underlying the current study was Conceptual Metaphor Theory by Lakoff and Johnson (1980). Identification of metaphors was carried out based on MIP (Metaphor Identification Procedure) (Pragglejaz Group, 2007), a reliable and explicit tool for marking and identifying metaphorically used words. The hypothesis, based on previous research establishing this finding, was that prepositions top the list in this regard, being by far the most metaphorical word class. The cognitive predispositions made available by the student’s L1 are also of importance in this equation. Similar research would advance our understanding of the role of metaphor teaching, and in what form and to what degree it should be explicitly carried out.


Keywords


Metaphor Use; Learner Language; Word Class; L1

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnes, J. (Ed.). (1984). Complete works of Aristotle, volume 1: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.‏

Boers, F. (2000). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for specific purposes, 19(2), 137-147.‏

Carter, R., McCarthy, M., Channell, J., & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 68-75). London: Longman.‏

Charteris-black, J. (2002). Second Language Figurative Proficiency: A Comparative Study of Malay and English. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 104-133.

Chen, Y. C., & Lai, H. L. (2013). Teaching English idioms as metaphors through cognitive-methods: A case in an EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 6(6),13-20.‏

Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics (Vol. 6). J. Benjamins Pub

Dirven, R. (2001). English phrasal verbs: theory and didactic application. Applied cognitive linguistics, 2, 3-27.‏

Erel, S., Bulut, D., & Mannasoglu, H. (2015). A corpus-based study of Turkish EFL students’ metaphorical language use in writing. In Third International Corpus Research Conference (pp. 60-62).‏

Goatly, A. (2011). The language of metaphors. Routledge.‏

Holme, R. (2003). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Springer.‏

Irujo, S. (1986). Don't put your leg in your mouth: Transfer in the acquisition of idioms in a second language. Tesol Quarterly, 20(2), 287-304.‏

Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.‏

Kaal, A. A. (2012). Metaphor in conversation. Vrije Universiteit.‏

Kövecses, Z. (2001). A Cognitive Linguistic View of Learning Idioms in an FLT Context. Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy, 87-115.

Krennmayr, T. (2008). Using dictionaries in Linguistic Metaphor Identification. In N.L. Johannesson & D.C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.

Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in Newspapers. LOT Dissertation Series, vol.276, Utretcht.

Krzeszowski, T.P. (1990). Contrasting Languages. The scope of contrastive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lakoff, G. (2014). The all new don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.‏

Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: why you can't understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. Penguin.‏

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 268–294.

Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., & Turner, S. (2013). An Investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language Writing. Applied linguistics, 35 (2), 117-144.

Low, G. (1988). On Teaching Metaphor. Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 125–147.

MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical Competence in EFL: Where are we and where should we be going? A view from the language classroom. AILA Review, 23(1), 155-173.

MacLennan, C. H. (1994). Metaphors and Prototypes in the Learning Teaching of Grammar and Vocabulary. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 32(2), 97-110.

Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Piquer-Piriz, A. M. (2008). Young Learners’ Understanding of Figurative Language. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach (pp. 183-198). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Ponterotto, D. (1994). Metaphors we can learn by. English Teaching Forum, 32(3), 2-7.Group, P. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and symbol, 22(1), 1-39.‏

Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Taylor, J. R. (2003). Polysemy's Paradoxes. Language Sciences, 25(6), 637-655.

Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 456-488.

Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(11), 852-863.‏

Veliz, L. (2017). Enhancing ESL learners’ vocabulary learning of metaphorically- words. Journal of language teaching and research, 8(5), 835-846.‏




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v3i1.43006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM)



JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING INNOVATIONS AND MATERIALS is published by the Language Center of Universitas Tanjungpura in collaboration the with the English Language Teaching Materials (ELTeaM) association  [Download MoU]. The publication of this journal is indexed by Google Scholar, ROAD, Garuda, and Crossref. Download full Board Committees here

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.

View My Stats