Assessment of Bukavu Finalist Pupils' English Active Vocabulary Knowledge

Mihigo Bienfait Trésor

Abstract


The Congolese national program of English instructs that secondary school pupils be equipped with 2,000 active words in the four years of English training (based on 500 active words per year), so that they can be able to communicate effectively in English. However, the Congolese State Exams do not evaluate finalist pupils’ level of English active vocabulary knowledge to check whether this objective is reached or not. Consequently, the finalist pupils’ actual level of English active vocabulary knowledge at the end of their secondary school education remains unknown. To have an idea on the level, this study aimed at assessing Bukavu finalist pupils’ English active vocabulary knowledge. After a random sampling of 35 (10%) Bukavu secondary schools with the final year, the data were collected from 1506 Bukavu finalist pupils of the scholar year 2021/2022 through a test of English active vocabulary knowledge, which comprised multiple choice and traditional questions. The data, compiled in Excel for easy handling, showed the following English proficiency levels among Bukavu finalist pupils: below elementary 4.1%, elementary 69.9%, pre-intermediate 22.8%, intermediate 2.8%, upper-intermediate 0.4%, and advanced 0.0%. In summary, most pupils in Bukavu secondary schools end their English training with an "elementary level," possessing an average of 594 (29.7%) active words instead of the expected 2,000. Finally, relevant recommendations were made to the Congolese legislator, teachers of English and Bukavu secondary school pupils for the increase of the level.


Keywords


Evaluation; English active words; secondary school finalist pupils; Bukavu town; Congolese program of English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carter, R. A. (1987). Is there a core vocabulary? Some implications for language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 178-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.178

Carter, R. A. (1987). Vocabu1ary: Applied linguistic perspectives. Allen & Unwin.

English Language Education Section. (2009). Enhancing English Vocabulary Learning and Teaching at Primary Level. Curriculum Development Institute.

Goulden, R., Nation, I.S.P. and J. Read (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 341–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.4.341

Hornby, A.S. (2006). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary. 7th Edition. OUP.

Kambale, I.M.B. (2014). A Course in applied linguistics intended for first year licence students. Unpublished Lecture Notes. ISP/Bukavu.

Katalin, D. (2008). The written assessment of the vocabulary knowledge and use of English majors in Hungary. PhD Dissertation. University of Szeged.

Krashen, S. and T. Terrell (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Pergamon Press.

McCarten, J. (2007). Teaching vocabulary. Lessons from the Corpus. Lessons for the Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.

McCarthy, M., and F. O’Dell. (1994). English vocabulary in use. Upper-intermediate. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, M. (2004). From corpus to course book. In JALT National Conference, Nara, Japan.

Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Newbury House.

Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge university press.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

O’Keeffe, A., M. J. McCarthy, and R.A. Carter (2007). From Corpus to Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., & Malekpur, A. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies from the bottom-up: A grounded theory. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15(2), 235-251.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.

Richards, J.C. (2008). Moving beyond the plateau from intermediate to advanced levels in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

SAMAFOS. (1982). Program d’anglais enseignement général – Enseignement spécialisé. EPSP, Services Pédagogiques.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12(3), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921.

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT journal, 49(2), 133-143.

Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (1998). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge university press.

Tembue, Z.W. (2016). Historical and critical analysis of the national curriculum of English. Unpublished Third Cycle Lecture Notes. ISP/Bukavu.

Wilkins, D.A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v5i1.70643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Education Program

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOURNAL OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM (JEEP) - ISSN 2721-6896

Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) is published by English Education Department of Universitas Tanjungpura

Accredited on SINTA (S4) & Indexed on:

Indexing-neliti Indexing-neliti europub semantic-shcolar harvard-library uos-library bu-library openaire worldcat lens.org researchgate journalstories

Editor and Administration Address:

English Education Department
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Tanjungpura
Jl. Profesor Dokter H. Hadari Nawawi, Bansir Laut, Kec. Pontianak Tenggara, Kota Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat 78115

Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) © 2024 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0