PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EKSPLORASI KONSEP GEOMETRI BERSTRUKTUR DARI TEORI VAN HIELE BERBANTUAN SOFTWARE GEOGEBRA

Dominicus Savio Pratikna, Sugiatno Sugiatno, Agung Hartoyo

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the requirements of instrument, the characteristics of the developed questions prototype, the feasibility of the questions, and the thinking level of students regarding Van Hiele's Theory of geometry concept taught with assistance of Geogebra Software. This study was a Research and Development using Wina Sanjaya's model. The instrument' development procedure consists of four stages, namely: Preliminary Stage, Product Development Stage; Stage of Trial and Product Validation and Dissimination Stage of products. The instrument feasibility is based on the accuracy and practicality test. The subjects of this study were all students of class XI Santu Petrus Pontianak 2016/2017 Academic Year, with a sample of class XI-MIA3 students chosen randomly. The results showed the level of instrument feastibility which expressed through experts' testing and student' opinions, calculation of validity, reliability, distinguishing factors, levels of difficulty, and practicality test results. The instrument obtained an average validity of 0.68 belongs to high category, a reliability of 0.998 belongs to very high category, and a difficulty level of 0.35 belongs to moderate category. The percentage of content validity, construction and language content rated by the experts  amounted to 91.16%, which categorized as high. The student response rate was 80.9% which belong to good category.

Keywords: Instruments, Van Hiele's theory, Geogebra Software

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bautista, Gerome H. 2016. An Assessment of Grade 8 Geometry Teaching Guide of the K to 12 Basic Education Program Based on Van Hiele Model of Geometric Thinking and Department of Education’s Standards. Saint Mary’s University, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. [online], tersedia:

http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/18/6/index.html.

Crowley, Mary L..1987. The Van Hiele Model of The Development of Geometric Thought. Yearbook of NCTM.

Depdiknas.2008. Panduan Penulisan Butir Soal. Jakarta:Direktorat PSMA.

Guzman, Miguel de. 2002. The Role of Visualisation in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Analysis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. [online], tersedia: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472047.pdf.

Hohenwarter, Markus. 2008. Teaching and Learning Calculus With Free Dinamic Mathematics Software GeoGebra. [online], tersedia: https://archive.geogebra.org/static/publications/2008-ICME-TSG16-Calculus-GeoGebra-Paper.pdf.

Kennedy, Leonard M. Tipps, Steve, & Johnson, Art. 2008. Guiding Childern’s Learning of Mathematics. Belmont, USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Mahmudi, A.2010. Membelajarkan Geometri dengan Program GeoGebra. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY. [Online]. Tersedia: http://eprints.uny.ac.id/10483/1/P6-Ali%20M.pdf.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Virginia: NCTM, Inc.

Putra, Nusa. 2015. Research Development-Penelitian dan Pengembangan: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Perkasa.

Sugiono. 2016. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sumaryanta. 2015. Pedoman Penskoran. PPPPTK Matematika, Yogyakarta.

Sweeney, Susan. 2017. Integrating Visual Literacy Training into the Business Curriculum. A Case Study at Dublin Business School. School of Business and Law Dublin Business School Dublin, Ireland. [online], tersedia: https://dbsbusinessreview.ie/index.php/journal/article/view/7/6.

Tessmer, Martin.1993. Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. British Library.

Turmudi. 2008. Landasan Filsafat dan Teori Pembelajaran Matematika (Berparadigma Eksploratif dan Integratif). Jakarta : Leuser Cipta Pustaka.

Usiskin, Zalman. 1982. Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. CDASSG Project. National Inst. Of Education (ED), Washington, DC.

Van De Walle, John. A. 2008. Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah Jilid 2 Pengembangan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.

Watson, Conoiah. 2012. A Comparison of Van Hiele Levels and Final Exam Grades of Students at The University of Southern Mississippi. The University of Southern Mississippi.

Wina Sanjaya. 2013. Penelitian Pendidikan, Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Jakarta: Kharisma Putra Utama.

Zulkardi. 2006. Formative Evaluation: What, Why, When, and How. [online], tersedia: http://www.oocities.org/zulkardi/books.html.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/ja.v1i2.42881

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.