Publication Ethics

It is fundamental for all gatherings either the the author, the editor or the reviewer to take after the underneath standard:

 

Responsibility of Editor

  • Publication Judgement

The Editor is authorized to selecting and publishing of the article. He has right to accept or reject the paper or can also request for modification. The Editor-in-Chief is answerable for judgment based on reviewers. For modification or error or any other correction, a note will be published for the author.

  • Concealment

No one has right to disclose the information about a manuscript that is submitted to the journal for review. The editor can only share that details with the reviewers, the publisher but not with other editor or author. The data of submitted paper will be private.

  • Fair Play

An editor will evaluate the manuscript for their paper substance without regard to sexual orientation, religious conviction, citizenship, rationality of authors.

  • Disclosure and conflict of interest

With no agreement of the author, their unpublished material that is uncovered in original copy couldn't be utilized by editors for their own research material.

 

Responsibility of Author

  • Reporting standards

Data of quantitative statement should be represented precisely in the paper. 

  • Data access and retention

During the review, process authors could be asked to submit the raw data of their related research and make it publically available. 

  • Originality, plagiarism and acknowledgement of sources

The author should ensure that the work they have submitted finally is original and have no duplicity. 

  • Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

Submitting the same research paper in multiple journals may constitute the unethical publication or is unacceptable. 

  • Authorship of the paper

Authorship of paper should be limited to those have submitted the same manuscript in more than one journal. 

  • Fundamental errors in published works

When authors come to know about their error in their own published research, it is their accountability to inform prompt to the publisher or request them to correct the inaccuracy or retract the paper. 

  • Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Authors should include the statement in their manuscript that conversant assent was obtained for participants experiment process. 

 

Responsibility of Reviewer

  • Contribution to editorial decisions

Editors are responsible for taking a decision and to give a comment authors to make required modification on their submitted manuscript.

  • Promptness

Reviewers selected by Editor-in-Chief to review the submitted paper in the journal found themselves unqualified for that particular purpose inform promptly to the editor and decline the invitation.

  • Confidentiality

The editor needs to ensure that the material submitted is confidential during review session by reviewers. 

  • Standards of objectivity

Reviews should define objectively. No personal criticism is allowed.  

  • Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers are responsible for notifying the editor if any similarity or overlap is found between two manuscripts. 

  • Disclosure and conflict of interest

Information in the manuscript that is not published by the author could not be used by the reviewers for their own research work.