Fenny Veranika


The existence and boom of internet use among the net Generation highlights the benefits of asynchronous online discussion (AOD) in higher educational context. The convenience to learn at anytime from anywhere as well as building collaborative learning has led many experts to suggest AOD as a promising tool in extending language teaching learning. Regrettably, in this era of internet and Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) popularity, the implementation of AOD in language teaching learning are still limited in number. Even, in this infancy stage, many educators simply apply AOD to bricks mortar classes without optimally structure, which results in lower student participation. In addition, most of the contributions by students were in surface level of knowledge construction and in serial monologues. To address these issues, this article offers a view on the need of integrating AOD in teaching learning language and an instructional strategy called Starter Wrapper technique to structure and manage online discussion for the purpose of generating more student participation.


Online discussion, asynchronous online discussion, Starter Wrapper technique


Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. JALN, 5(2), 2-17. Retrieved from

Bakar, N. A., Latiff, H., & Hamat, A. (2013). Enhancing ESL learners speaking skills through asynchronous online discussion forum. Asian Social Science, 9(9), 224-233. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v9n9p224

Barss, K. (2012). Fostering computer-mediated L2 interaction beyond the classroom. Language Learning and Technology, 16(1), 10-25.

Bonk, C. J., &Dennen, V. (2007). Frameworks for design and instruction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.) (pp. 233–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chen, J. (2007). How to adopt learner-centered approach in Chinese EFL context. (T. Le, & Q. Le, Eds.) The International Journal of Language Society and Culture (22), 57-61. Retrieved from 1327-77w4X

Corich, S., Kishuk, & Hunt, L.M. (2004). Assessing discussion forum participatiqon: In search of quality. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(12).

DeNoyelles, A., Zydney, J. M., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of Inquiry through online asynchronous discussions . MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), 153-165.

De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role support and self-assessment on students' levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, No. 2, 177-188.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. Retrieved from

Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C., (1998). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology. Center for Research on Learning and Technology. 2-98. Retrieved March 17, 2005, from

Hiltz, S. R., & Wu, D. (2004). Predicting learning from synchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(2), 139-152.

Hirvela, A. (2006)Z. Computer-mediated communication in ESL teacher education. ELT Journal, 6(3), 223–241.

Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and practice. London: SAGE.

Internet to hit 3 billion users in 2015. (2014, November 20). Retrieved at 2015/1011602

Internet World Statistics. (2017, June). Retrieved at

Jaggars, S.S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G.W. (2013). What we know about online course outcomes. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University, April 2013, 1-8.

Lim, S. C. R., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2011). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: An investigation of student facilitation techniques. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 52-65. Retrieved from

Marden, M. P., & Herrington, J. (2011). Supporting interaction and collaboration in the language classroom through computer mediated communication. In T. Bastiens & M. Ebner Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and teleqcommunications 2011 (pp. 1161-1168). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Mandernach, B. J., Gonzales, R. M., & Garret, A. L. (2006). An examination of online instructor presence via threaded discussion participation. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2 (4). Retrieved at

Mohr, K., & Mohr, E. (February, 2007). Extending English language learners’ classroom interactions using the response protocol. The Reading Teacher, 60(5), 440-450. Retrieved from

Nguyen, L. V. (2011). Computer-mediated collaborative learning in a vietnamesse tertiary EFL context: Process, product, and learners perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation thesis). Massey University, Palmerstone North, New Zealand.

Orvis, L., & Lassiter, L. R. (2007). Computer supported collaborative learning: Best practices and principles for instructors. Hershey, New York: Information Science Publishing.

Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C.F. (2003, September). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language learning & Technology, 7(3), 119-140. Retrievedfrom

Prasad, D. (2009). Empirical study of teaching presence and critical thinking in asynchronous discussion forums. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(11).

Scott, A. (2010). Promoting high-order thinking in online discussions. In Volkan Yuzer, T., & Kurubacak, G. (Eds.), Transformative learning and online education: Aesthetics, dimensions and concepts (pp. 236–300). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-985-9.ch005

Shana, Z. (2009). Learning with technology: Using discussion forums to augment a traditional-style class. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), 214-228.

Shih, R.C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. In J. Waycott & J. Sheard (Eds), Assessing students' Web 2.0 activities in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845. Retrieved from

Shin, J. K., & Bickel, B. (2012). Building an online community of inquiry with student-moderated discussions. In L. England (Ed.), Online language teacher education: TESOL perspectives (pp. 102-121). New York, NY: Routledge.

So, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 143-160.

Tehrani, I. A., & Abdulah, K. I. (2011, September). Interactional patterns of teacherless online community of language learners. Journal of Edupres, 1, 87-93.

Thompson, J. T. (2006). Best practices in asynchronous online course discussions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 3 (7), 19-30.

Veranika, F. (2013). The use of online discussions to support students' cognitive engagement in language learning (Unpublished undergraduate's thesis). Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat.

Wasoh, F. (2014). EFL@Facebook: Integrating social networking tool as a medium in writing classroom. 9th International Academic Conference, (pp. 927-935). Istanbul. Retrieved at

Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperation scripts. In Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledgecommunication (eds. R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada), pp. 15-38. Kluwer, Boston.

Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science,34, 451-480. Springer.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
ICoTE Proceedings is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats